2022
DOI: 10.1002/job.2648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leader humility and team innovation: The role of team reflexivity and team proactive personality

Abstract: Despite the recent surge of research on leader humility, it remains unclear how and when teams benefit from it. Drawing on social cognitive theory, we propose a moderated mediation model that we test using multisource, time-lagged data collected from 71 teams in a university-affiliated hospital. We find that humble leaders indirectly enhance team innovation via greater team reflexivity. Additionally, we consider the average level of proactive personality of team members as a boundary condition of the positive … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
(196 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leaders can steer the team toward reflexive learning in several ways. For instance, they can show humility (Leblanc, Rousseau, and Harvey, 2022) by engaging in premortems that bluntly consider potential problems at the onset of a project (Luth, Flinchbaugh, and Miles, 2022) or by acknowledging the unique, challenging nature of the project (Edmondson and Harvey, 2017). They can also cultivate psychological safety by asking probing questions (Edmondson, 1999(Edmondson, , 2018 or by formalizing roles and responsibilities (Bresman and Zellmer-Bruhn, 2013).…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaders can steer the team toward reflexive learning in several ways. For instance, they can show humility (Leblanc, Rousseau, and Harvey, 2022) by engaging in premortems that bluntly consider potential problems at the onset of a project (Luth, Flinchbaugh, and Miles, 2022) or by acknowledging the unique, challenging nature of the project (Edmondson and Harvey, 2017). They can also cultivate psychological safety by asking probing questions (Edmondson, 1999(Edmondson, , 2018 or by formalizing roles and responsibilities (Bresman and Zellmer-Bruhn, 2013).…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, our work also contributes to team research by extending the nomological network of learning behaviors in teams, which has mainly focused on cognitive emergent states such as transactive memory and performance‐related outcomes such as effectiveness and quality (Edmondson et al, 2007). Future research should consider other types of team learning behavior during strategic change—such as reflexivity (e.g., Harvey & Green, 2022; Leblanc et al., 2022) or search (e.g., Bresman, 2010; Harvey, 2023)—to see if they have similar effects on teams' emotional capabilities for change and if they can mutually reinforce each other. Overall, team negative emotional reaction to change is likely central during turbulent times, and therefore a construct deserving of more attention at the collective level from both change and team scholars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the context of the present study the individual would refer to the entrepreneurial woman while the environment is represented by entrepreneurial educational environment which is depicted in Figure 1, the conceptual model. Basing on the social cognitive theory Leblanc, Rousseau, and Harvey (2022) postulate that proactive personality and innovation exist within the same framework. Thus the present study, also grounded in the social cognitive theory presents proactive personality and innovation capability in the same conceptual model both leading to a mutual outcome (performance) and in the context of the present study, performance of entrepreneurial women.…”
Section: Research Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%