2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2020.125850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leader-following consensus of multi-agent systems via novel sampled-data event-triggered control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The critical task is to design a distributed protocol only using the local information to drive each of agents reach an agreement on certain global interests. Leader–following consensus implies that all agents follow a leader, while leaderless‐following consensus represents that agents approach to the agreement of all their states without objective node 11 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The critical task is to design a distributed protocol only using the local information to drive each of agents reach an agreement on certain global interests. Leader–following consensus implies that all agents follow a leader, while leaderless‐following consensus represents that agents approach to the agreement of all their states without objective node 11 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leader-following consensus implies that all agents follow a leader, while leaderless-following consensus represents that agents approach to the agreement of all their states without objective node. 11 Generally speaking, there are roughly two types of communicating topologies among agents, that is, the fixed topologies and the switching topologies. The fixed topologies can model the stationary and reliable communicating network where multiagent systems operating in, which the communicating paths among agents maintain unchanged during the working process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al (2021) discussed the MASs containment control problem by means of two kinds of distributed event-triggered mechanisms, in which the event-triggered control protocols are the state feedback control law and the dynamic output feedback control protocol. Combining the sampling data skill, event-triggered scheme, and impulsive protocol, Zhao et al (2021) proposed an event-triggered controller based on sampling data for MASs. Li et al (2021a) developed a time-varying formation control protocol under event-triggered scheme to eliminate continuous communication, further reducing unnecessary computational cost successfully.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the considerable amount of works addressed the stabilization and synchronization problem of dynamical systems with input delays in the literatures. [24][25][26][27][28] In particular, the Smith predictor (SP)-based control strategy have procured a greater attention among research communities for various dynamical systems with input delays. [29][30][31] Although, it cannot achieve productive performances ahead the time-varying input delays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is a very general issue and at the same time, provoking technical challenges in the real‐time applicability. As a result, the considerable amount of works addressed the stabilization and synchronization problem of dynamical systems with input delays in the literatures 24‐28 . In particular, the Smith predictor (SP)‐based control strategy have procured a greater attention among research communities for various dynamical systems with input delays 29‐31 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%