LEAD operational safety: Development and validation of a tool to measure safety control strategies

Casey, Tristan; Neal, Alan C.; Griffin, Mark

doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.005

Cited by 19 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the series of studies summarised by Chapter 3 (Casey et al, 2019), we found that the relationships between LEAD dimensions and self-regulatory states were not as 'clean' as the theory would have predicted. For instance, the theory would suggest that…”

Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 71%

“…Journal of Occupational Health Psychology,22(3), 341. Casey, T. W., Neal, A., & Griffin, M. (2019). LEAD operational safety: Development and validation of a tool to measure safety control strategies.…”

Section: /01/2020mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For instance, research has shown that promotion and prevention are actually non-mutually exclusive; rather than being opposing ends on a continuum, it may be possible for an individual to be simultaneously high on promotion and prevention (Wallace & Chen, 2006). Previous research on the LEAD model has also identified moderate positive correlations between the underpinning self-regulatory foci (Casey et al, 2019). Further research is required to identify the effect of a 'balanced'…”

Section: Lead Profilesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One view is overly prescriptive and constraining, and the other view is overly emergent and impractical. A middle ground could be to focus instead on encouraging underlying practices that over time, gradually shape and contribute to the safety culture (Casey et al, 2019;Hopkins, 2019). In other words, managing safety with culture in mind rather than attempting to change the culture itself.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The LEAD model, first outlined by Casey and colleagues (2017), positions safety as a 'control problem', whereby superior safety performance can be achieved through aligning bundles of safety practices with specific work situations. A measurement tool was then developed and validated by Casey et al (2019), and this current study takes the research program an additional step by evaluating an intervention 'toolkit' that was…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Development and evaluation of an industry safety leadership toolkit

Casey¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 71%

Section: /01/2020mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Lead Profilesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Development and evaluation of an industry safety leadership toolkit

Casey¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Drivers of employees' proactiveness for sustainability embeddedness: Examining situation‐related antecedents of information exchange

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Embedding sustainability in day-to-day operations necessitates employees' proactiveness beyond compliance with standardised management practices.Exchanging information on safety and environmental issues is acknowledged as a component of workers' proactive behaviours for sustainability embeddedness, which is hardly promoted by codified procedures. Accordingly, identifying leverages to stimulate information exchange is a primary objective for academics and practitioners.The study investigates drivers of information exchange on safety and environmental near misses by examining five situation-related antecedents: rewards/reinforcements, organisational boundaries, social proactiveness, stakeholder salience and connectedness. The study relies on a mixed method approach, by combining social network analysis and a questionnaire survey conducted among four large Italian companies. The findings partially support the hypothesis of the study, highlighting rewards/reinforcements and connectedness as relevant antecedents of information exchange, while organisational boundaries only partially relate with information exchange. Surprisingly, stakeholder salience and social proactiveness do not emerge as significant drivers of information exchange. The study contributes to the debate on extra-role pro-sustainability behaviours and provides implications for managerial practice.

show abstract

Embedding corporate sustainability: An empirical analysis of the antecedents of organization citizenship behavior

Testa

Todaro

Gusmerotti

et al. 2019

Corp Soc Responsibility Env

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The relation between organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and the performance of both safety and environmental management systems has led researchers to investigate the drivers of safety-specific and environmental-oriented OCB. However, although the management of environmental and safety issues is often fully integrated into organizational and managerial practice, a holistic perspective of the drivers of health, safety, and environmental (HSE)-oriented OCB is still lacking. Thus, the aim of the present study is to investigate the antecedents of HSE-related OCB (OCBHSE).Drawing on both the OCB and sustainability literature, data from 135 managerdirect report dyads collected from eight large Italian companies are analyzed, to assess the effect of both situation-related antecedents (i.e., organizational ambidexterity and leadership style) and person-related antecedents (i.e., prosocial values) on prosocial and proactive OCBHSE. Organizational ambidexterity emerges as a direct situation-related antecedent of both prosocial and proactive OCBHSE, whereas management by exception and passive leadership have a negative effect on the OCBHSE in direct reports. Surprisingly, transformational and contingent reward leadership styles do not emerge as significant drivers of OCBHSE. In terms of person-related antecedents, the results highlight that prosocial values in direct reports significantly influence prosocial but not proactive OCBHSE. Finally, as OCBHSE is conceptualized in the study as a dimension that is complementary to formal HSE management structures, our findings can contribute to the general organizational effort to improve HSE performance.

show abstract

LEAD operational safety: Development and validation of a tool to measure safety control strategies

Cited by 19 publications

References 47 publications

Development and evaluation of an industry safety leadership toolkit

Development and evaluation of an industry safety leadership toolkit

Drivers of employees' proactiveness for sustainability embeddedness: Examining situation‐related antecedents of information exchange

Embedding corporate sustainability: An empirical analysis of the antecedents of organization citizenship behavior

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About