2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lead bioaccessibility in farming and mining soils: The influence of soil properties, types and human gut microbiota

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ground dust can impact human health through ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact [33,34]. Therefore, there are usually two methods to assess such health risks, with one of the bioaccessibility assessments simulating lung and gastric-intestinal fluids [35,36] and one with exposure assessment models developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [37]. The latter method was used in this study, with three main routes of human exposure, including direct ingestion of substrate particles (ADD ing ), inhalation of re-suspended particles through mouth and nose (ADD inh ), and dermal absorption of trace elements in particles adhered to the exposed skin (ADD dermal ), being calculated using Equations ( 2)-(4).…”
Section: Health Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ground dust can impact human health through ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact [33,34]. Therefore, there are usually two methods to assess such health risks, with one of the bioaccessibility assessments simulating lung and gastric-intestinal fluids [35,36] and one with exposure assessment models developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [37]. The latter method was used in this study, with three main routes of human exposure, including direct ingestion of substrate particles (ADD ing ), inhalation of re-suspended particles through mouth and nose (ADD inh ), and dermal absorption of trace elements in particles adhered to the exposed skin (ADD dermal ), being calculated using Equations ( 2)-(4).…”
Section: Health Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, HHRA was evaluated based on total concentrations of potentially toxic elements. However, using the total concentrations of metal(loid)s has proved to be an overestimation of the bioavailable metal(loid)s and health risks (Boim et al, 2020;Du et al, 2020). Therefore, it is useful to pair HHRAs with IVBA tests to adjust for the bioaccessible fraction (Boim et al, 2020;Du et al, 2020;Mehta et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, using the total concentrations of metal(loid)s has proved to be an overestimation of the bioavailable metal(loid)s and health risks (Boim et al, 2020;Du et al, 2020). Therefore, it is useful to pair HHRAs with IVBA tests to adjust for the bioaccessible fraction (Boim et al, 2020;Du et al, 2020;Mehta et al, 2020). It is evident that the inclusion of metal(loid) bioaccessibility in HHRA is crucial to avoid overestimations in HHRA, however, it is still not a common practice (Kumpiene et al, 2017;Mehta et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the traditional assessment methods, bioaccessibility can more accurately reflect the release of heavy metals in the human body, which is more scientific and reasonable. There have been a lot of researches on bioaccessibility at domestic and abroad, but the research objects mainly focus on soil heavy metals and metal mining areas, etc (Du et al 2020;Sultana et al 2020). Although the bioaccessibility of heavy metals in dust has been reported, the simulated digestion phase is only limited to the gastrointestinal phase, and the bioaccessibility of the simulated respiratory system in vitro is less reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%