2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaching properties of three different micropaticulate diets and preference of the diets in cod (Gadus morhua L.) larvae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
1
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
53
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…So, while larvae do not possess the digestive machinery developed enough to utilize complex protein, a more soluble nitrogen form such as CAA, that would allow to finely tune dietary protein quality, is often easily lost by leaching (Kvale et al 2006(Kvale et al , 2007Nordgreen et al 2008;Yúfera et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, while larvae do not possess the digestive machinery developed enough to utilize complex protein, a more soluble nitrogen form such as CAA, that would allow to finely tune dietary protein quality, is often easily lost by leaching (Kvale et al 2006(Kvale et al , 2007Nordgreen et al 2008;Yúfera et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physico-chemical characteristics of micro-diets such as color, shape, particle size, sedimentation rate or release of attractants can influence feed intake by very young fish (Saenz de Rodriganez et al, 2011). In addition, larvae have to be able to digest the particles and be able to absorb and assimilate the nutrients that must fit the requirement of the larvae (Kvale et al, 2006).…”
Section: Effect Of Feed Type On Weaning Post-larvaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the incorporation of a label in small particles of larval inert diets, in order to determine larval diet selection (i.e. feed intake) and nutrient utilisation, is technically difficult, and protein and AA leaching problems can easily occur (Kvåle et al 2006;López-Alvarado et al 1994;Nordgreen et al 2007;Yúfera et al 2002). Therefore, new methodologies need to be used in order to determine larvae diet selection (live prey or inert diet) and how feed is being metabolised by the fish.…”
Section: Diet Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 C or 15 N) or radio tracer labelling molecules (e.g. 3 H, 14 C or 35 S) has improved and simplified the quantification of feed intake and nutrient utilisation (Boehlert and Yoklavich 1984;Conceição et al 2001;Engrola et al 2009a;Gamboa-Delgado et al 2008;Jomori et al 2008;Kolkovski et al 1997;Kvåle et al 2006;Rust 1995). In Senegalese sole fed with an Artemia replacement strategy, it was possible to observe that 16-17 DAH postlarvae presented an Artemia intake of 11% and an Artemia protein digestibility of 57% (Engrola et al 2009a) and that the contribution of Artemia to tissue growth was 62% (Gamboa-Delgado et al 2008).…”
Section: Diet Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%