2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaching behavior of CRT funnel glass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(30 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lines on these figures are drawn as a visual aid. The results for funnel glass at 248 and 364 days was on the extension line of the previous results 12) again. Alkali and Pb elements were soluble in comparison to other elements.…”
Section: Leaching In Acidic Solutionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The lines on these figures are drawn as a visual aid. The results for funnel glass at 248 and 364 days was on the extension line of the previous results 12) again. Alkali and Pb elements were soluble in comparison to other elements.…”
Section: Leaching In Acidic Solutionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The experimental conditions agree with those reported in our previous study. 12) After the test in alkaline condition at pH 11.0, the leachant solution was acidified with one drop of HCl so as to dissolve all hydroxide precipitates after removal of the sample from the vessel. We measured the weight of the sample before and after the test and calculated the total mass loss (ML) from the weight change.…”
Section: ¹1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One research study reported on the leaching behavior of CRT funnel glass pieces of a given size and protective layer formed during the leaching process (Yamashita et al, 2010). However, to the best of our knowledge, the structural changes in activated CRT funnel powder after leaching has not been reported.…”
Section: Characterization Of Samples After Acid Leachingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The high lead content of the CRT glass and the numerous difficulties involved in lead removal have left landfilling as the only viable disposal option. However, leaching of lead from the CRT glass might result in contamination of the ground water and soil, and therefore (Yamashita et al 2010), landfilling of this type of waste has been banned (Yot and Méar 2009;Yamashita et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%