1980
DOI: 10.3406/hom.1980.368131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Le Nom de personne

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…I have come to the conclusion that this kind of indissoluble association between person and name (and particularly given name, see Zonabend 1980) is not a specifically Brazilian thing but is an intrinsic part of a tradition of personal naming that is written into Portuguese‐speakers in such a historically sedimented fashion that the bearers of these notions are not even aware of them as norms or as formulated values.…”
Section: The Truth Of Mademuazéliamentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…I have come to the conclusion that this kind of indissoluble association between person and name (and particularly given name, see Zonabend 1980) is not a specifically Brazilian thing but is an intrinsic part of a tradition of personal naming that is written into Portuguese‐speakers in such a historically sedimented fashion that the bearers of these notions are not even aware of them as norms or as formulated values.…”
Section: The Truth Of Mademuazéliamentioning
confidence: 94%
“… For a plurality of examples, see the collection of papers edited by vom Bruck and Bodenhorn (2006). The classic studies by Alleton (1993) on Chinese naming, by Maybury‐Lewis (1974) and Lopes da Silva (1986) on Xavante naming, and by Zonabend (1980; 1984) on French naming remain, however, inspirations. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C'est lors de ce premier round que sont découvertes des mutations aux allures encore de matricule : 241201, 268907, 261206, 230501 deviennent bientôt, respectivement, croaker, spinster, lingerer et fickle. L'opération qui consiste à pourvoir ces nouveaux objets d'un nom qui ne soit pas un numéro est important, tant il est vrai qu'il en va des drosophiles comme des hommes : les nommer et ainsi les individualiser est constitutif de leur identité aussi sûrement que décrire la manière dont ils se comportent [18] 7 . Toutefois, comme en attestent les épisodes suivants, cela ne suffit pas toujours à les faire venir à l'existence.…”
Section: De La Nature Dans Le Laboratoire : Se Libérer Du Sens Commununclassified
“…This commentary discusses personal names in relation to other technologies of belonging, highlighting the relevance of practices of naming for body politics, radical differences between the recent Western tradition of surnames and some other naming traditions and epistemologies, the formation of subjectivity in slavery through naming, and the cultural and political clashes that sometimes result when an expanding empire encounters and colonizes an indigenous tradition. Practices of naming, it is argued, are not only key elements of identification and personhood, embodied in the biosocial habitus much like other biomarkers, but they also situate people in genealogies, social networks, states, and empires (Zonabend 1980). Naming involves powerful speech acts, making history, constituting persons and the social relations and systems within which they are embedded—families, communities, states, and empires; indeed, naming is one of the key examples used in Austin’s (1962) classic formulation of speech acts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%