2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.amp.2017.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

« Le miroir de la haine ». La prise en charge pénitentiaire de la radicalisation : analyse clinique et criminologique de 112 personnes placées sous main de justice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On one hand, there are young people for whom radical engagement leads them to be under judicial control, and on the other side there are condemned adults who meet, by availability, radicalisation in prison. Individuals in prison can encounter radical commitment in a very variable way [27].…”
Section: Individual Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On one hand, there are young people for whom radical engagement leads them to be under judicial control, and on the other side there are condemned adults who meet, by availability, radicalisation in prison. Individuals in prison can encounter radical commitment in a very variable way [27].…”
Section: Individual Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Youths are subject to psychological pressure from the recruiters to adopt the radical beliefs and to break with friends and family [46]. Bazex & Bénézech highlighted one category of radicalised individuals who have a charismatic character associated with proselytic and manipulative behaviours: 'the proselytic networker' [27]. Radicalised individuals with other profiles (e.g., 'ambitious offenders'; 'people in a precarious situation') may be vulnerable to indoctrination by 'proselytic networkers'.…”
Section: Micro-environmental Risk Factors (Family and Proximal Enviromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To tackle the phenomenon of radicalization among young Europeans, authors have suggested individual risk factors such as personal vulnerabilities (e.g., early experiences of abandonment, perceived injustice, personal uncertainty and perceived group threat) and psychiatric disorders (Bazex et al 2017;Doosje et al 2013); micro-environmental risk factors such as family dysfunction and friendships with radicalized individuals (Bazex et al 2017;MIVILUDES, 2015;Schuurman and Horgan, 2016;Van San et al 2013); societal risk factors such as geopolitical events, societal polarization and societal changes (Benslama, 2016;Coid et al 2016;O'Duffy, 2008;Wiktorowicz, 2005); and systemic factors such as an encounter between an individual who is a candidate for becoming radicalized and a recruiter who uses sectarian techniques to isolate and dehumanize the candidate (Bouzar, 2014;MIVILUDES, 2015). However, recent reviews have highlighted that studies with empirical data are limited; they are mainly based on either small samples of males involved in terror attacks or projects (Bazex et al 2017), i.e., a retrospective design (Veldhuis and Staun, 2009), or Muslim by birth individuals (Kundnani, 2015), making it impossible to generalize the results or to establish causal relations. Additionally, several studies remain at a theoretical level or use a population-based sample that provides only indirect tendencies (Schmid, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, some of our young persons have diverse psycho-sociopathic personality traits (extraversion, aggressiveness, early antisocial behaviour) facilitating their adhesion to a jihadist group, whereas others display schizoid personality traits (introversion, detachment, emotional poverty) or even a delusional disorder predisposing them to a lone-actor terrorist activity. Around 10% of 450 individuals' research population suffering from patent mental disorders, which is representative of the national figure of individuals who are on file f or j ihadism [8].…”
Section: Indicators Of Deradicalization 263mentioning
confidence: 99%