Le larynx dans la maladie de Steinert

Terracol, J; Guerrier, Y

doi:10.1159/000105900

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As I have said already, this requires separate consideration from the point of view of symptomatology because it presents itself as a somewhat rare condition usually under the mistaken diagnosis of an acute maxillary antral infection. In 1939 Asherson (1939) made a comprehensive review of this subject before the advent of penicillin and a considerable literature of reported cases has grown up in the laryngological and dental journals of the world (Bernheim et al, 1948 ;Dunphy and Fraser, 1947 ;Howard and Robinson, 1948;Jacoby and Sagorin, 1945 ;Offret and Meaux, 1947;Oringer, 1948;Schenck, 1948 ;Terracol et al, 1947). Staphylococcus aureus is almost always the organism responsible and the route of infection has variously been thought to be the maxillary antrum, the dental germ of the first molar tooth, or the lachrymal apparatus.…”

Section: Osteomyelitis In Sucklingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Osteomyelitis of the Maxilla

Macbeth

1952

J. Laryngol. Otol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Osteomyelitis In Sucklingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Osteomyelitis of the Maxilla

Macbeth

1952

J. Laryngol. Otol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Osteomyelitis in sucklinigs.-This requires separate treatment from the point of view of symptomatology because it presents itself as a somewhat rare condition, usually under the mistaken diagnosis of an acute maxillary sinus infection. In 1939 Asherson [5] made a comprehensive review before penicillin was available, and considerable literature of reported cases has grown up in the Laryngological and Dental Journals of the world [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Staphylococcus aureus is almost always the organism responsible, and the route of infection has variously been thought to be the maxillary antrum, the dental germ of the first molar, or the lacrimal apparatus.…”

Section: Illustrative Casesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Osteomyelitis of the Maxilla [Abridged]

1951

Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mr. R. G. Macbeth: Osteomyelitis of the maxilla has always been an uncommon disease and it is becoming rarer still. The course and prognosis have been radically changed from grave to benign since the advent of chemotherapeutic agents and the antibiotics. Etiology.-Operative injury or direct spread of infection from the teeth or the antrum are the commonest aetiological factors. Lillie [1], however, has suggested that the tear sac may also be the primrry-seat of infection. A bloodborne infection is theoretically possible but rather unlikely on a basis of anatomical considerations. Pathological anatomy.-The maxilla is an irregular bone, containing a large air sinus whose walls are in the main composed of thin compact bone, but below which lies a mass of spongy alveolar medullary bone. Infection is more likely to gain a footing and to spread in lhe alveolar bony mass, than in the relatively compact bone of the antral walls. As Wilensky [2] has pointed out, the arterial supply is derived from the internal maxillary artery, whose

show abstract

“…He investigated 155 inpatients and 30 outpatients in whom the uveitis was acute in 153 and chronic in 32.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%