2015
DOI: 10.4000/semen.10472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Le façonnage de la critique par les dispositifs. Le cas du débat sur les nanotechnologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The publication of works by Perelman & Olbrechts-Tyteca (1958) and Toulmin (1993) helped create a new starting point for the study of argumentation, which has become even more complex with the addition of cognitive (Kuhn, 1991;2005;Kuhn, Iordanou, Pease & Wirkala, 2008), interactional (Doury, Quet & Tseronis, 2015;Kerbatch-Orecchioni, 1992;Traverso, 1999), and polemic components (van Eemeren, Houtlosser & Snoeck, 2007), including the image of the Self in discourse (Amossy, 2006(Amossy, , 2014(Amossy, , 2016 or the role of emotion in argumentative discourse (Plantin, 2011(Plantin, , 2015, amongst others.…”
Section: Palabras Clavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The publication of works by Perelman & Olbrechts-Tyteca (1958) and Toulmin (1993) helped create a new starting point for the study of argumentation, which has become even more complex with the addition of cognitive (Kuhn, 1991;2005;Kuhn, Iordanou, Pease & Wirkala, 2008), interactional (Doury, Quet & Tseronis, 2015;Kerbatch-Orecchioni, 1992;Traverso, 1999), and polemic components (van Eemeren, Houtlosser & Snoeck, 2007), including the image of the Self in discourse (Amossy, 2006(Amossy, , 2014(Amossy, , 2016 or the role of emotion in argumentative discourse (Plantin, 2011(Plantin, , 2015, amongst others.…”
Section: Palabras Clavementioning
confidence: 99%