2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.psfr.2012.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Le développement de la mémoire de travail : perspectives dans le cadre du modèle de partage temporel des ressources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(84 reference statements)
1
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the time-based resource sharing (TBRS) model of WM, two main mechanisms have been described as responsible for the temporary maintenance of verbal information in WM: articulatory rehearsal and attentional refreshing (see Camos, 2015, 2017, for reviews). They are assumed to be qualitatively distinct because rehearsal is thought to operate by phonological repetition of memoranda, while refreshing is considered as a domain-general, attention-based mechanism that operates by thinking back briefly to recently active memoranda (see Barrouillet & Camos, 2015; Camos, 2015, 2017; Camos & Barrouillet, 2014; Camos et al, 2018, for reviews).…”
Section: Maintenance Of Verbal Information In Wmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the time-based resource sharing (TBRS) model of WM, two main mechanisms have been described as responsible for the temporary maintenance of verbal information in WM: articulatory rehearsal and attentional refreshing (see Camos, 2015, 2017, for reviews). They are assumed to be qualitatively distinct because rehearsal is thought to operate by phonological repetition of memoranda, while refreshing is considered as a domain-general, attention-based mechanism that operates by thinking back briefly to recently active memoranda (see Barrouillet & Camos, 2015; Camos, 2015, 2017; Camos & Barrouillet, 2014; Camos et al, 2018, for reviews).…”
Section: Maintenance Of Verbal Information In Wmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the major problem that is often discussed in the literature on executive functions (Brown et al, 2012;Packwood, Hodgetts, & Trembaly, 2011). Nevertheless, models of the development of intelligence suggest that cognitive development results from a cascade of related processes in which agerelated changes in the speed of information processing play a critical role (Camos & Barouillet, 2014;Case, 1985;Demetriou, Mouyi, & Spanoudis, 2008;Fry & Hale, 1996). According to Demetriou et al (2008), the changes in information processing speed would be "followed in time" by changes in working memory and, later, by changes in selective attention.…”
Section: Variability Of Time Judgmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Par ailleurs, le temps de traitement de la phase interférente semble jouer un rôle important sur la capacité de rappel durant une tâche de MDT (Barrouillet & Camos, 2012 ;Bayliss, Jarrold, Baddeley, Gunn, & Leigh, 2005 ;Towse & Hitch, 1995 ;Saito & Miyake, 2004). En effet, chaque item mémorisé est susceptible d'être oublié à cause du temps passé sur la tâche interférente (Barrouillet, Bernadin, & Camos, 2004 ;Camos & Barrouillet, 2014 ;Cowan, 1999 ;Towse & Hitch, 1995). Le temps de traitement de la tâche interférente est tributaire du coût du traitement de cette tâche (Barrouillet et al, 2004).…”
Section: éValuation De La Capacité De La Mémoire De Travailunclassified
“…Cela confirme le rôle important du temps de traitement au sein des phases interférentes dans l'évaluation de la capacité de la MDT (Barrouillet & Camos, 2012 ;Bayliss et al, 2005 ;Saito & Miyake, 2004 ;Towse & Hitch, 1995). En effet, plus le temps de traitement est faible, plus le temps de rafraîchissement de la trace mnésique est élevé (Barrouillet, Bernardin, & Camos, 2004 ;Camos & Barrouillet, 2014). Grâce à des tâche plutôt facile, voire moyennement difficile.…”
Section: Résultatsunclassified