2003
DOI: 10.3917/eg.323.0205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Le bruit des avions, facteur de révélation et de construction de territoires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
15

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…After validating the information we had 492 3 valid surveys, from this total 309 stated their WTP (including true zero values), so 183 people protested equivalent to 37.19%, which is similar to other comparable studies (Faburel, 2002, had a 49% protest rate when applied CV to the Orly airport case). According to this 309 valid surveys average WTP is 8.95 Euros/person/month.…”
Section: Willingness To Pay Direct Approachsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After validating the information we had 492 3 valid surveys, from this total 309 stated their WTP (including true zero values), so 183 people protested equivalent to 37.19%, which is similar to other comparable studies (Faburel, 2002, had a 49% protest rate when applied CV to the Orly airport case). According to this 309 valid surveys average WTP is 8.95 Euros/person/month.…”
Section: Willingness To Pay Direct Approachsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…According to Navrud (2002) one the pioneering studies was carried out by Opschoor in 1988 in Switzerland, in 1995 Thune-Larsen studied, using CV and Conjoint Analysis (another stated preferences method), the noise impact on Oslo's residential surroundings. In the Paris Orly airport Faburel (2002) found, using CV applied to 607 persons, that WTP was explained by the stated annoyance, but also WTP increased when surveyed people lived in detached houses; other aspects influencing WTP were the income level and disinformation about the problematic associated to the airport noise. Feitelson et al (1996) have carried out a comprehensive study in three cities (not specified in their paper), they found that NDSI adopted values of 2.4%-4.1% for proprietors, and 1.8-3.0% for renters.…”
Section: Stated Preferences On the Airport Noise Impact Short Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dans le cas de Vienne, des membres de l'association la plus combative analysent le refus des habitants d'un ensemble résidentiel proche de rejoindre l'opposition au projet comme un mécanisme de « déni de réalité » qui leur permettrait de ne pas se poser de questions au sujet des risques potentiels pour la santé associés à la présence de la décharge, ni d'ailleurs à remettre en cause leur choix de résidence. Il s'agirait en d'autres termes d'un processus de réduction de la « dissonance cognitive » introduite par la présence de nuisances et de risques dans l'espace proche résidentiel (Schoeneich et Busset-Henchoz, 1998), phénomène mis en évidence en ce qui concerne la question du bruit autour des aéroports (Faburel, 2003 ;Melé, 2006).…”
Section: Figures De La Proximitéunclassified
“…La vitalité de ces débats fait, depuis une décennie, de la question du sensible une entrée de plus en plus mobilisée pour étudier l'aménagement (Augoyard, 1995 ;Faburel, 2003 ;Amphoux et al, 2004 ;Lolive et Soubeyran, 2007 ;Blanc, 2008 ;Labussière, 2009a).…”
Section: Palabras Clavesunclassified