1992
DOI: 10.1161/01.atv.12.11.1353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LDL binding sites on platelets differ from the "classical" receptor of nucleated cells.

Abstract: Washed human platelets bound radioiodinated low density lipoprotein ( 125 I-LDL) to a class of saturable binding sites; they numbered 1,348±126 per platelet, and the dissociation constant (K D ) was 50.7±9 nM. I25I-LDL binding to platelets was reversible, and apparent equilibrium was attained within 25 minutes at 22°C and was characterized by forward and reverse rate constants of 1.47xlO4 Xsec"'xM" 1 and 8xlO~4xsec~' xM" 1 , respectively. Such binding was largely unaltered by temperature, divalent ions, and ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Platelets do not express CD81 (Levy et al, 1998), SR-BI (Rhainds & Brissette, 2004), DC-and L-SIGN (van Kooyk & Geijtenbeek, 2003) or the classical LDL-R (Korporaal et al, 2004;Pedreno et al, 1992), which are putative HCV receptors (Agnello et al, 1999;Gardner et al, 2003;Lozach et al, 2003; Monazahian et al, 1999;Pileri et al, 1998;Pohlmann et al, 2003;Scarselli et al, 2002). Thus, other molecule(s) might mediate the interaction between HCV and platelets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Platelets do not express CD81 (Levy et al, 1998), SR-BI (Rhainds & Brissette, 2004), DC-and L-SIGN (van Kooyk & Geijtenbeek, 2003) or the classical LDL-R (Korporaal et al, 2004;Pedreno et al, 1992), which are putative HCV receptors (Agnello et al, 1999;Gardner et al, 2003;Lozach et al, 2003; Monazahian et al, 1999;Pileri et al, 1998;Pohlmann et al, 2003;Scarselli et al, 2002). Thus, other molecule(s) might mediate the interaction between HCV and platelets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viral interaction with platelets is well recognized, as it has been described for other viruses such as herpes simplex virus (Forghani & Schmidt, 1983), Vaccinia virus (Bik et al, 1982), Human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) (Lee et al, 1998(Lee et al, , 1993Olinger et al, 2000), echovirus 1 (Xing et al, 2004), hantavirus (Gavrilovskaya et al, 1998) and the flavivirus dengue type 2 (Wang et al, 1995) among others. Several mechanisms have been proposed as contributing to thrombocytopenia, but recently a positive correlation between thrombocytopenia and HCV association with platelets was described (de Almeida et al, 2004), suggesting a direct viral effect on platelet count.Platelets do not express CD81 (Levy et al, 1998), SR-BI (Rhainds & Brissette, 2004), DC-and L-SIGN (van Kooyk & Geijtenbeek, 2003) or the classical LDL-R (Korporaal et al, 2004;Pedreno et al, 1992), which are putative HCV receptors (Agnello et al, 1999;Gardner et al, 2003;Lozach et al, 2003; Monazahian et al, 1999;Pileri et al, 1998;Pohlmann et al, 2003;Scarselli et al, 2002). Thus, other molecule(s) might mediate the interaction between HCV and platelets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finding that the signaling pathway is initiated by the apoB100 component of LDL may point to the involvement of an LDL-binding receptor. However, platelets are known to lack the classical LDL-R as well as LDL receptorrelated protein-1 (LRP1) (12,13). Recently, a splice variant of apolipoprotein E receptor-2 (apoER2) has been identified in platelets and megakaryocytic cell lines (14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] In subjects deficient in apolipoprotein (apo) B or E receptor, LDL binding to platelets is preserved, indicating that another binding site must be involved. 3 Platelet aggregation is mediated via fibrinogen binding to sites on the integrin-␣ IIb ␤ 3 complex that become exposed once the cell is activated. The same complex has been implicated in the binding of LDL because the separate subunits bound 125 I-LDL on Western blots.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%