2010
DOI: 10.4304/jnw.5.1.28-38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LDB: Localization with Directional Beacons for Sparse 3D Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks

Abstract:

In this paper, we propose a novel distributed localization scheme LDB, a 3D localization scheme with directional beacons for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks (UWA-SNs). LDB localizes sensor nodes using an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) as a mobile beacon sender. Mounted with a directional transceiver which creates conical shaped directional acoustic beam, the AUV patrols over … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Range-based systems use techniques such as ultrasound to measure the distance between nodes and then triangulation to compute the positions of nodes. Range-free techniques use implicit information provided by anchor nodes to obtain positions of nodes, such as number of hops between devices or radio coverage membership [8][9][10]. Although range-free protocols do not need additional hardware for distance measurements, they can only provide rough positional estimates.…”
Section: Centralized Localization Versus Distributed Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Range-based systems use techniques such as ultrasound to measure the distance between nodes and then triangulation to compute the positions of nodes. Range-free techniques use implicit information provided by anchor nodes to obtain positions of nodes, such as number of hops between devices or radio coverage membership [8][9][10]. Although range-free protocols do not need additional hardware for distance measurements, they can only provide rough positional estimates.…”
Section: Centralized Localization Versus Distributed Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LDB [9,10], AAL [20,21], DNRL [22,23], and MobiL [24] focus on how anchors provide their positions to the sensor nodes and assume that the anchors are mobile and equipped with GPS to obtain their locations. Their disadvantages include high localization delays and high cost as the accuracy of the location relies on a large number of mobile beacons, especially for large-scale UWSNs.…”
Section: Distributed Localization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, they assume the radiation energy of the transducer is focused on some angle range with no leaking of radiation energy outside this range. For example, such transducers are used for localization using directional beacons in [16] and for directional packet forwarding in [17]. These solutions also use only one frequency.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the matrix with only some static values cannot cover dynamically changed mobility patterns. Recently, some researchers have suggested AUV (autonomous underwater vehicle)-aided localization using directional antenna in [17][18][19][20]. They improved the localization accuracy because AUV provides relatively highprecision information to the nodes.…”
Section: Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%