2012
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LBT observations of the HR 8799 planetary system

Abstract: We have performed H and K S band observations of the planetary system around HR 8799 using the new AO system at the Large Binocular Telescope and the PISCES Camera. The excellent instrument performance (Strehl ratios up to 80% in H band) enabled the detection of the innermost planet, HR 8799e, at H band for the first time. The H and K S magnitudes of HR 8799e are similar to those of planets c and d, with planet e being slightly brighter. Therefore, HR 8799e is likely slightly more massive than c and d. We also… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
87
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(81 reference statements)
2
87
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dynamical stability studies of the planetary system that orbits HR 8799 provide additional indirect evidence for a young system age. An older stellar age implied larger planet masses that would lead to a dynamically unstable system (Currie et al 2011;Sudol & Haghighipour 2012;Esposito et al 2013). Therefore, we adopt a value of 30 Myr for Tucana, Columba, and Carina and 45 Myr for Argus (the mean between isochrone and lithium depletion boundary ages).…”
Section: Tucana Columba Carina and Argusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamical stability studies of the planetary system that orbits HR 8799 provide additional indirect evidence for a young system age. An older stellar age implied larger planet masses that would lead to a dynamically unstable system (Currie et al 2011;Sudol & Haghighipour 2012;Esposito et al 2013). Therefore, we adopt a value of 30 Myr for Tucana, Columba, and Carina and 45 Myr for Argus (the mean between isochrone and lithium depletion boundary ages).…”
Section: Tucana Columba Carina and Argusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range will be shifted towards higher masses when assuming older ages. However, constraints from the stellar properties (Marois et al 2008;Baines et al 2012), the mass of the disk (Su et al 2009), and models of dynamical stability of the four planets (Esposito et al 2013;Goździewski & Migaszewski 2014) suggest that the system is young. Other hints for small radii or low masses of the planets come from the fitting of their spectral energy distribution (e.g., Marois et al 2008;Bowler et al 2010;Currie et al 2011;Barman et al 2011;Madhusudhan et al 2011;Galicher et al 2011;Ingraham et al 2014), although there are uncertainties on the atmospheric composition and the physical processes governing their atmospheres assumed for the models (e.g., solar/non-solar metallicity, physics of the clouds, non-equilibrium chemistry).…”
Section: Constraints On the Properties Of A Fifth Planetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dotted line in the panel for HR 8799 e indicates the orbital solution labeled "B" in Table 5. The orange circles indicate the ephemeris predicted in Goździewski & Migaszewski (2014). and coplanar orbits (Goździewski & Migaszewski 2009Fabrycky & Murray-Clay 2010;Soummer et al 2011) and circular and non-coplanar orbits (Esposito et al 2013). Recently, Goździewski & Migaszewski (2014) have built a long-term stable model of the system, with all planets on quasi-circular coplanar orbits and likely involved in 8b:4c:2d:1e mean motion resonance.…”
Section: Orbital Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, this technique allows us to obtain photometric, spectroscopic, and astrometric measurements of the detected companions, and for this reason it is a fundamental technique to study the atmosphere of the known objects, their mass-luminosity function and their orbits (see, e.g, Rameau et al 2013a;Kuzuhara et al 2013;Esposito et al 2013;Currie et al 2013) . However, direct detection of extrasolar planets is challenging for two reasons: (1) the large luminosity contrast with respect to the star, which is of the order of 10 −6 for giant young planets with high intrinsic luminosity, and 10 −8 -10 −9 for old planets seen in reflected and intrinsic light; and (2) the small separation between the star and the planet, of the order of a few tenths of arcsec for planets at few AUs around stars at a distance up to 100 pc from the Sun.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%