2015
DOI: 10.3334/ornldaac/1284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LBA-ECO LC-07 JERS-1 SAR Flooded Wetlands and Vegetation, Amazon Basin: 1995-1996

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All data in this study are publicly available and can be accessed from the links given in the text. Discharge data from HYBAM (http://www.ore-hybam.org) and ANA (using QGIS plugin; https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/ ana_data_acquisition/), water surface altimetry data from ENVISAT (http://hydroweb.theia-land.fr/), flooded area (GIEMS-2) from Prigent et al (2020), and 3-arc second static high flood extent from Hess et al (2015). The Global Hydrodynamic Model CaMa-Flood is available from Yamazaki et al (2021).…”
Section: Data Availability Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All data in this study are publicly available and can be accessed from the links given in the text. Discharge data from HYBAM (http://www.ore-hybam.org) and ANA (using QGIS plugin; https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/ ana_data_acquisition/), water surface altimetry data from ENVISAT (http://hydroweb.theia-land.fr/), flooded area (GIEMS-2) from Prigent et al (2020), and 3-arc second static high flood extent from Hess et al (2015). The Global Hydrodynamic Model CaMa-Flood is available from Yamazaki et al (2021).…”
Section: Data Availability Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to this, we have evaluated the model considering flood extent (FE; high-resolution static map representing the spatial distribution of flooded pixels) of high floods given by Hess et al (2015) to show the method can be modified to consider other metrics for robust evaluation. The OSK has been estimated first considering the weights of 33.33%, 33.33%, 16.67%, and 16.67% for Q, WSE, FA, and FE, respectively, and second, considering equal weights of 25% for all four variables (refer Figures S10 and S11 The current method decomposed 25 sub-basins for the comparative evaluation of CaMa-Flood with the SRTM and MERIT DEMs.…”
Section: Multivariable Integrated Evaluation With Different Manning's...mentioning
confidence: 99%