2015
DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2015-052270.209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LB1.4 Sti rates among gay men taking daily antiretrovirals for pre-exposure prophylaxis of hiv: the nsw demonstration project prelude

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of these studies: data came from 26 countries, mostly from HICs (62 [70%]) and from MSM-only programs (58 [66%]). Table 2 provides more data on included studies, all of which were deemed to be of sufficient methodological quality as determined by the Joanna Briggs Institute tool (ie, score of ≥5) . A summary of the countries that provided data is shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of these studies: data came from 26 countries, mostly from HICs (62 [70%]) and from MSM-only programs (58 [66%]). Table 2 provides more data on included studies, all of which were deemed to be of sufficient methodological quality as determined by the Joanna Briggs Institute tool (ie, score of ≥5) . A summary of the countries that provided data is shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…serosorting), or the use of strategic positioning whenever engaging in anal sex with a partner of known HIV positive status (seropositioning) [ 12 ]. Among PrEP users, high rates of STIs have been reported [ 13 15 ], as well as high rates of condomless sex [ 14 ], and increasing rates of STIs over time [ 6 ]. However, data from the US National HIV Behavioural Surveillance surveys have documented secular trends of decreasing rates of condom use prior to PrEP, with the percentage of men with no condomless anal sex partners decreasing from 61% in 2001, to 54% in 2011 and 40% in 2014 [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-three studies were included , with 11 776 participants in total, from which 18 were journal articles [18,20,22,23,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]38,39], and five conference abstracts [19,21,24,37,40]. Twenty-two studies were cohort studies [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] (either prospective or retrospective) and one was a randomized controlled trial [30]. Articles included were published from 2015 to 2022 with a median sample size of 280 (interquartile range: 158-682) ranging from 81 to 2404.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%