2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2015.7139603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lazy collision checking in asymptotically-optimal motion planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
107
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, there is no need to check the entire tree because most of the nodes will not contribute to the optimal path. In this paper, we use the lazy-validitychecking strategy, similar to Hauser (2015). The main idea is that we only check the validity of the most promising nodes until a feasible optimal path (flight corridor) is found.…”
Section: Incremental Flight Corridor Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, there is no need to check the entire tree because most of the nodes will not contribute to the optimal path. In this paper, we use the lazy-validitychecking strategy, similar to Hauser (2015). The main idea is that we only check the validity of the most promising nodes until a feasible optimal path (flight corridor) is found.…”
Section: Incremental Flight Corridor Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective if invalid edges are near the start. 1 The framework can be extended to handle non-uniform evaluation cost as well…”
Section: B the Lazy Shortest Path (Lazysp) Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sampling‐based planners (LaValle, ) have enjoyed a lot of attention due to their simplicity and asymptotic guarantees (Karaman & Frazzoli, ). They are also amenable to a lot of modifications to improve real‐time performance such as biased sampling (Hsu, Sánchez‐Ante, & Sun, ; Urmson & Simmons, ), lazy evaluation (Bohlin & Kavraki, ; Gammell, Srinivasa, & Barfoot, ; Hauser, ), or hybrid local global optimization (Choudhury, Gammell, Barfoot, Srinivasa, & Scherer, ; Luna, Şucan, Moll, & Kavraki, ; Raveh, Enosh, & Halperin, ). However, a large number of such sampling‐based methods require solving the boundary value problem online, that is, finding a steering input to drive the system from one configuration to another.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also present analysis for each module in both simulation and real flights (Section 9). This paper builds upon our previous works on most of the individual components of our framework: using an ensemble of planners , 2015, dynamics projection filter , guaranteeing safety (Arora, Choudhury, Althoff, & Scherer, 2014, 2015, training a dynamic list of planners (Tallavajhula & Choudhury, 2015), and smooth route optimization (Dugar, Choudhury, & Scherer, 2017a, 2017b. In this paper, for the first time we present a description of the unified architecture, details of the trajectory planning framework and extensive flight test evaluation of the whole system.…”
Section: Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%