2017
DOI: 10.1109/jestpe.2017.2688999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Layout Optimization of the Receiver Coils for Multitransmitter Wireless Power Transfer Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After OR operation of the three logical output values of each comparator, one driving signal (pwm2) is created for the fully controlled switch S 2 while making pwm2 out of phase to form the driving signal for S 1 . The driving signals for S 3 the same side of the inverter does not conduct concurrently to prevent damage of the semiconductor devices from short circuit. The current will flow in the positive or negative direction only if both of the driving signals for the two diagonal arms become high level.…”
Section: Multifrequency Sinusoidal Pulse Width Modulation Driving Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After OR operation of the three logical output values of each comparator, one driving signal (pwm2) is created for the fully controlled switch S 2 while making pwm2 out of phase to form the driving signal for S 1 . The driving signals for S 3 the same side of the inverter does not conduct concurrently to prevent damage of the semiconductor devices from short circuit. The current will flow in the positive or negative direction only if both of the driving signals for the two diagonal arms become high level.…”
Section: Multifrequency Sinusoidal Pulse Width Modulation Driving Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to inject multifrequency signals underground to harvest enough geoelectric information. In recent years, the multifrequency wireless power transfer (WPT) for multiple loads is a popular subject . A well‐designed multifrequency resonant network is very useful for the transfer efficiency and self‐adaptability of WPT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, as more efficient coil design methods were created, the design optimizationbased coil design methods for S-S WPT systems were developed, which compensated for the drawbacks of the conventional methods. They are largely categorized into the shape optimization method [22,23], which can optimize the size and shape of the coils, and layout optimization [24][25][26], which can optimize the layout as well as the size and shape of the coil. The shape optimization was used to determine the optimized coil and ferrite of the transmitter and receiver for S-S WPT systems with no load to minimize the thickness of the receiver coil while satisfying all constraints (i.e., induced voltage and electromagnetic field intensity) [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another case of the shape optimization for designing the coil and ferrite was to minimize the mass of the coil and ferrite of the receiver for S-S WPT systems (i.e., railway wireless charging systems) with a ferriteless transmitter module while satisfying the same electrical performances of the S-S ferrite-based railway wireless charging systems [22]. The existing coil layout optimization for S-S WPT systems have been developed to optimize the receiver coil layout by using the fixed grid (FG)-based coil representation [24] and smooth boundary (SB) coil representation [25,26]. The method in [26] can determine the optimal receiver coil layout for S-S WPT systems that can maximize the power transfer efficiency while satisfying all of the selected constraints (e.g., mass of the receiver coil and rated power required by a receiver module) under the given conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, with a three-layer structure, the big number of coils results in high cost. There are also other attempts at optimizing shape and layout of multiple coils with regard to the gap between transmitting and receiving coils, etc., [12][13][14][15] but those are specific designs not suited for versatile use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%