2009
DOI: 10.1080/14774003.2009.11667734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Layers of Vulnerability in Occupational Safety and Health for Migrant Workers: Case Studies from Canada And The UK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
91
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Gaps in employment protection and minimum entitlements emerge; compliance is weakened as employee awareness of entitlements declines or is undermined by their labour market vulnerability; and enforcement processes encounter hurdles such as identifying those with legal responsibility in multiemployer worksites. Inconsistencies or discriminatory aspects in both the form and implementation of regulation practices bear most heavily on those in precarious employment (including foreign and undocumented workers, Sargeant and Tucker, 2009 The model includes risk factors which may be considered worker-related, such as inexperience, multiple-job holding and poor knowledge of legal rights, as well as factors stemming from the employer. However, the former, as will be demonstrated below, are also linked to employer practices.…”
Section: The Pdr Model: How Precarious Employment Affects Ohsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gaps in employment protection and minimum entitlements emerge; compliance is weakened as employee awareness of entitlements declines or is undermined by their labour market vulnerability; and enforcement processes encounter hurdles such as identifying those with legal responsibility in multiemployer worksites. Inconsistencies or discriminatory aspects in both the form and implementation of regulation practices bear most heavily on those in precarious employment (including foreign and undocumented workers, Sargeant and Tucker, 2009 The model includes risk factors which may be considered worker-related, such as inexperience, multiple-job holding and poor knowledge of legal rights, as well as factors stemming from the employer. However, the former, as will be demonstrated below, are also linked to employer practices.…”
Section: The Pdr Model: How Precarious Employment Affects Ohsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the USA between 1980 and 1996, as rates of occupational fatalities decreased by 45% among all workers, they increased from 4.3 to 5.7 per 100 000 among foreign-born workers and mostly in Hispanic and Latino workers 27. Disparities in occupational health and safety outcomes between migrants and native-born populations can be explained by differing exposure to a range of occupational health and safety risk factors 11. These include such things as the legal status of the migrant, where undocumented migrant workers have poor access to work rights and protections, or where migrants working in precarious jobs or as day labourers are reluctant to complain about adverse working conditions 28–30.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vah Jevšnik; Cukut Krilić 2016). 6 When identifying OSH-related vulnerabilities of posted workers, the layered framework to assess vulnerability in occupational safety and health for migrant workers developed by Sargeant and Tucker (2009) is arguably the most useful. Sargeant and Tucker define migrant workers as workers without a permanent status in the receiving countries, which is also applicable in cases of posting.…”
Section: The Osh Regulatory Framework and A Layered Approach To Vulnementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The article first provides an analytical and theoretical framework for discussing OSH-related vulnerabilities in transnational workplaces within the framework of posting of workers, primarily using Sargeant and Tucker's (2009) layered vulnerability approach. It then focuses on the case of Slovenia, drawing from the data obtained at joint visits and from semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%