The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/wcnc.2017.7925582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Layered Gibbs Sampling Algorithm for Near-Optimal Detection in Large-MIMO Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, a low computational complexity detector emerges as an essential requirement in LS‐MIMO systems. Many low‐complexity LS‐MIMO detectors have been proposed in recent literature, including detectors based on (i) local neighbourhood search , such as likelihood ascent search algorithm [4], and reactive tabu search algorithm [5]; (ii) message passing algorithms, based on belief propagation technique, such that LS‐detectors inspired in graphical models, as factor graph [6] and Markov random fields [7]; (iii) minimum mean square error (MMSE) approximation techniques [8, 9], which result in low complexity at the price of achieving good performance only at low system loading factor; (iv) Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques, which are based on Gibbs sampling (GS) [10], emerging as a promising approach to deal with LS‐MIMO structures [11–15], since such techniques demonstrate a near‐optimum performance while require a moderate complexity (quadratic order), also presenting a simple and effective way to solve the large‐scale detection problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this sense, a low computational complexity detector emerges as an essential requirement in LS‐MIMO systems. Many low‐complexity LS‐MIMO detectors have been proposed in recent literature, including detectors based on (i) local neighbourhood search , such as likelihood ascent search algorithm [4], and reactive tabu search algorithm [5]; (ii) message passing algorithms, based on belief propagation technique, such that LS‐detectors inspired in graphical models, as factor graph [6] and Markov random fields [7]; (iii) minimum mean square error (MMSE) approximation techniques [8, 9], which result in low complexity at the price of achieving good performance only at low system loading factor; (iv) Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques, which are based on Gibbs sampling (GS) [10], emerging as a promising approach to deal with LS‐MIMO structures [11–15], since such techniques demonstrate a near‐optimum performance while require a moderate complexity (quadratic order), also presenting a simple and effective way to solve the large‐scale detection problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the results do not consider the performance behaviour in high‐order modulation schemes. More recently, the MCMC detector with QR decomposition was addressed in [14, 18], which can reduce the number of operations due to the lower triangular matrix feature. Besides, based on the multiple random parallel Markov chains, the work in [13] proposes a MR strategy through parallel chains; such strategy reduced the algorithm's running time compared to MGS‐MR, despite the increasing of the number of real operations per symbol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and the computation in(16) requires only 6N operations. Consequently, the complexity of each layer of the ScNet architecture is 2N 2 + 5N .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides that, these results did not considered the performance behavior in high-order modulation systems. A QR decomposition approach within the MCMC detector was addressed in [16], [17], which demonstrated to reduce the number of operations due to the lower triangular matrix feature. Furthermore, based on the concept of multiple random parallel Markov chains, work in [18] proposes a MR strategy through parallel chains; such strategy reduced the algorithm's running time compared to MGS-MR, despite the increasing of the number of real operations per symbol.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%