2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2014.05.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Layered dipyridylamide coordination polymers from in situ lactonization of 2-carboxycinnamic acid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in synthetic procedures leading to 5 and 6 was simply the substitution of acetonitrile for DMF as cosolvent, and hydrolysis of acetonitrile produces a weak acid/weak base mixture (CH 3 CO 2 H/NH 3 ) with presumably a rather similar influence on pH to that produced from DMF (HCO 2 H/HN­(CH 3 ) 2 ); however, the rates would presumably be different and it appears that in the case of complex 6 a different reaction, an oxidation leading to oxalate, was more important. Complex 2 contains both the original ligand ccn 2– and the lactone 1,3-dihydro-3-oxo-1-isobenzofuranacetate (dibf – ) formed in situ from cyclization of ccn 2– , as previously reported, and found in several complexes. , In all cases, the uranyl/dicarboxylate ligand ratio was 7:10 so as to favor the formation of an anionic species and the incorporation of structure-directing counterions, but this ratio is found in none of the complexes formed, with the 1:1 ratio being observed instead in all cases but that of complex 7 for which it is 1:2. This however does not necessarily prevent the incorporation of counterions or additional metal ions due to the presence in several cases of anionic coligands, nitrato in 1 , dibf – in 2 , formato in 4 , hydroxo in 5 , and oxalato in 6 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference in synthetic procedures leading to 5 and 6 was simply the substitution of acetonitrile for DMF as cosolvent, and hydrolysis of acetonitrile produces a weak acid/weak base mixture (CH 3 CO 2 H/NH 3 ) with presumably a rather similar influence on pH to that produced from DMF (HCO 2 H/HN­(CH 3 ) 2 ); however, the rates would presumably be different and it appears that in the case of complex 6 a different reaction, an oxidation leading to oxalate, was more important. Complex 2 contains both the original ligand ccn 2– and the lactone 1,3-dihydro-3-oxo-1-isobenzofuranacetate (dibf – ) formed in situ from cyclization of ccn 2– , as previously reported, and found in several complexes. , In all cases, the uranyl/dicarboxylate ligand ratio was 7:10 so as to favor the formation of an anionic species and the incorporation of structure-directing counterions, but this ratio is found in none of the complexes formed, with the 1:1 ratio being observed instead in all cases but that of complex 7 for which it is 1:2. This however does not necessarily prevent the incorporation of counterions or additional metal ions due to the presence in several cases of anionic coligands, nitrato in 1 , dibf – in 2 , formato in 4 , hydroxo in 5 , and oxalato in 6 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The emission spectrum of complex 4 is even more anomalous, since these uranium emission peaks are completely absent and only a broad emission band is seen. The ligand present in complex 2 resulting from cyclization of 2-carboxycinnamate is in fact an example of an organic luminophore known to form broad-band emissive complexes with Zn II and Cd II but with emission wavelengths much shorter than those of the broad bands in 2 , 4 , and 8 . Excitation spectra were recorded for complexes 2 , 4 , and 8 and are shown in Figure , where it is apparent that a broad band lies at lower energy than the uranyl excited-state manifold.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compound 2 crystallizes in the acentric orthorhombic space group P2 1 2 1 2 with the Flack parameter [25] of -0.013 (14) indicating enantiomeric purity within the crystal, within experimental error. The asymmetric unit of compound 2 contains a divalent nickel atom, a cca ligand, a full 4-bpfp ligand, two bound water molecules, and net three water molecules of crystallization.…”
Section: Structural Description Of {[Ni(cca)(4-bpfp)(h 2 O) 2 ]·3h 2 mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Reaction of divalent metal nitrates with H 2 cca and 3-pyridylisonicotinamide (3-pina) caused in situ rearrangement of the acid precursor to the anionic lactone 1,3-dihydro-3-oxo-1-isobenzofuranacetate (dibf), with formation of an isostructural series of (4,4) grid coordination polymers [M(3-pina) 2 (dibf) 2 ] n (M = Zn, Cd, Co, Mn, Ni). [14] Scheme 2. Binding modes of the cca ligands in 1 and 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation