SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2016 2016
DOI: 10.1190/segam2016-13859781.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Layer stripping FWI for surface waves

Abstract: In this study, an innovative layer stripping approach for FWI specifically adapted to the physics of surface waves is investigated, to mitigate the cycle skipping problem. A combined high-to-low frequency filtering with gradually increasing offset ranges, are applied to observed and calculated data to update gradually deeper layers of the shear velocity model. Successful results for a synthetic data example are presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where α is the step length and the superscript (k) denotes the k th iteration. In practice, a preconditioned conjugate gradient method is used, where source illumination is used as the preconditioning factor (Luo and Schuster, 1991).…”
Section: Gradient Updatementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where α is the step length and the superscript (k) denotes the k th iteration. In practice, a preconditioned conjugate gradient method is used, where source illumination is used as the preconditioning factor (Luo and Schuster, 1991).…”
Section: Gradient Updatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, further studies are needed to assess its robustness in convergence. To enhance robustness, a layer stripping strategy for FWI of surface waves was presented by Masoni et al (2016) who first invert the high-frequency and near-offset data for the shallow S-velocity model, and gradually incorporates lower-frequency data with longer offsets to estimate the deeper parts of the model. All these methods, however, are still under development and require more tests to fully understand their relative benefits and limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is modified from Pérez Solano et al (2014) (Fig. 6d) and used by Masoni et al (2016) (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Synthetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One practical way to mitigate this problem is to use an initial model built by inverting surface-wave dispersion curves. Besides, an alternative objective function, such as amplitude-spectrum-based misfit (Pérez Solano et al 2014; 2D viscoelastic shallow-seismic FWI 3 Masoni et al 2016), envelope-based misfit (Wu et al 2014;Yuan et al 2015), and multi-objective misfit (Pan et al 2020), can be used to reduce the nonlinearity of surface-wave FWI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%