2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104783
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lay people and experts’ risk perception of pharmaceuticals in the environment in Southwestern Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Briefly, in the psychometric approach, individuals are requested to rate their perception of various risks and hazards based on several common risk characteristics identified in previous studies [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. Subsequently, a principal component analysis (PCA) was used to reduce the number of proposed characteristics into two main dimensions or factors, frequently identified and named as “dreaded” and “unknown risks.” The former refers to the extent to which a threat is perceived as being dreadful, uncontrollable, and involuntary, with a catastrophic potential and fatal consequences; however, the latter entails the extent to which an event or hazard is believed to be unobservable, unknown to individuals, unfamiliar, new, and has delayed consequences [ 15 , 17 ].…”
Section: The Psychometric Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Briefly, in the psychometric approach, individuals are requested to rate their perception of various risks and hazards based on several common risk characteristics identified in previous studies [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. Subsequently, a principal component analysis (PCA) was used to reduce the number of proposed characteristics into two main dimensions or factors, frequently identified and named as “dreaded” and “unknown risks.” The former refers to the extent to which a threat is perceived as being dreadful, uncontrollable, and involuntary, with a catastrophic potential and fatal consequences; however, the latter entails the extent to which an event or hazard is believed to be unobservable, unknown to individuals, unfamiliar, new, and has delayed consequences [ 15 , 17 ].…”
Section: The Psychometric Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many prior studies have identified the aforementioned two main dimensions [ 22 ]. However, other research, such as Bronfman et al [ 20 ], identified four dimensions of risk and labeled them as catastrophic potential, knowledge, involuntariness, and social and personal exposure.…”
Section: The Psychometric Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this direction, actions are required to reduce the release of these compounds using new technological solutions for at-source treatment as recently proposed [ 30 ]. Other initiatives include social, governmental, medical and analytical actuations to minimize the presence of pharmaceuticals in the environment [ 31 ] so that risk perception regarding pharmaceutical contamination can be contained [ 32 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Termed ‘dread’ and ‘unknown’, the former comprises attributes such as ‘fear’ and ‘voluntariness’, while the latter is associated with ‘newness’ and unknown or delayed impacts. This two-dimensional characterization of lay risk perception has held across topics ranging from food hazards [ 16 ] to pharmaceuticals [ 17 ], as well as across cultures [ 18 ] and time [ 19 ]. The psychometric paradigm was used in the present exploratory study to investigate perceptions of risk across zoonoses among the public; namely do zoonotic risk perceptions conform to the previously documented dimensions of ‘dread’ and ‘unknown’?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%