Lay Beliefs About Gender and Sexual Behavior: First Evidence for a Pervasive, Robust (but Seemingly Unfounded) Stereotype

Abstract

Although casual sex is increasingly socially acceptable, negative stereotypes toward women who pursue casual sex remain pervasive. For example, a common trope in television, film, and other media is that women who engage in casual sex have low self-esteem. Despite robust work on prejudice against women who engage in casual sex, little empirical work has focused on the lay theories individuals hold about them. Across six experiments with U.S. adults ( N = 1,469), we found that both men and women stereotype women (but not men) who engage in casual sex as having low self-esteem. This stereotype is held explicitly and semi-implicitly; is not driven by individual differences in religiosity, conservatism, or sexism; and is mediated by inferences that women who have casual sex are unsatisfied with their mating strategy—yet the stereotype persists when women are explicitly described as choosing to have casual sex. Finally, the stereotype appears to be unfounded; across experiments, the same participants’ sexual behavior was not significantly correlated with their self-esteem.

Contagious or prosocial? Perceptions of mask‐wearers toward Whites and Asians: A cross‐cultural comparison during the early stage of the COVID‐19 pandemic

“…In Study 2, political orientation was measured on social, economic, and overall ideology scales (0 = Very conservative , 10 = Very liberal ; α = 0.95–0.96; Krems et al., 2021). Within the Perceived Vulnerability to Disease scale (Duncan et al., 2009), the Perceived Infectability subscale assesses beliefs about susceptibility to infectious diseases (e.g., “In general, I am very susceptible to colds, flu, and other infectious diseases”; α = 0.73–0.80) and the Germ Aversion 2 subscale assesses emotional discomfort in situations with high potential for pathogen transmission (e.g., “It really bothers me when people sneeze without covering their mouths”; α = 0.67–0.70).…”

Parents of Children With High Weight Are Viewed as Responsible for Child Weight and Thus Stigmatized

“…Participants were asked to take part in a study on the accuracy of perceptions based on little information. Each participant was randomly assigned to view one of four stimuli describing and depicting a mother (Carol) or father (Tom) with an 8-year-old daughter (Emma); the daughter was described and depicted as having “obesity” or “average weight.” To accord with instructions to participants, each stimulus contained some information that was explicitly redacted (e.g., “Tom is a 34-year-old man living in [redacted]”); redacted information was unimportant to predictions and was kept constant across conditions (e.g., Krems et al, 2021; preregistration: 10.17605/OSF.IO/84TJ2).…”

Dyads in networks: We (dis)like our partners' partners based on their anticipated indirect effects on us

“…In both Experiments 1 and 2, participants entered the name of one of three possible existing social partners (randomly assigned): a same-sex friend they see regularly, a current romantic partner (or desired romantic partner if participants were single), or a same-sex rival (described as "someone whom you strongly dislike and is competitive with you, or who wants you to fail"). Names were piped into vignettes about these same social partners to increase realism (Krems et al, 2021a).…”