2008
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0807435105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laws of population growth

Abstract: An important issue in the study of cities is defining a metropolitan area, because different definitions affect conclusions regarding the statistical distribution of urban activity. A commonly employed method of defining a metropolitan area is the Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), based on rules attempting to capture the notion of city as a functional economic region, and it is performed by using experience. The construction of MSAs is a time-consuming process and is typically done only for a subset (a fe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
306
4
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 344 publications
(326 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
13
306
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Different from observed dynamics of clusters identified with CCA from 1981 to 1991, which exhibit all five types of changes (that is, no change, expansion, reduction, division and merge) in cluster shape (Rozenfeld et al, 2008), our model exhibits only three types (that is, no change, expansion and merge) in computer simulations. Since clusters may collide each other and merge together over time, they are generally not independent.…”
Section: (A)mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different from observed dynamics of clusters identified with CCA from 1981 to 1991, which exhibit all five types of changes (that is, no change, expansion, reduction, division and merge) in cluster shape (Rozenfeld et al, 2008), our model exhibits only three types (that is, no change, expansion and merge) in computer simulations. Since clusters may collide each other and merge together over time, they are generally not independent.…”
Section: (A)mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It is a long-standing problem that different definitions of spatial units based on administrative boundaries give rise to inconsistent conclusions at different scales (Rozenfeld et al, 2008). In comparison with our definition of natural cities, administrative boundaries of MSAs provided by the US Census Bureau (available online at http://www.census.gov/ geo/maps-data/data/cbf/cbf_msa.html) are constructed manually based on the subjective judgement.…”
Section: (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We can generate these rank size relations using various models: proportionate effect and preferential attachment of course, but also by subdividing a large hinterland into mutually exclusive subdivisions in a modular and regular manner, making various assumptions about population densities. This ties this kind of scaling back to both central place theory in the interurban context and to urban economics in the intraurban (Simon, 1955;Gabaix, 1999, Rozenfeld, Rybski, Andrade, Batty, Stanley, andMakse, 2008). In fact although rank-size scaling is highly stable through time, changes in the population of cities that make up such scaling can be highly volatile, and this remains a major puzzle in reconciling aggregate with disaggregate space-time correlations (Batty, 2010).…”
Section: Size Shape Scale and Space: Three Laws Of Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socio-economic data exhibit enough empirical evidences in support of universality, which prompt a community of researchers to propose simple, minimalistic models to understand them, similar to those commonly used in statistical physics. Typical examples are elections [26,27], population growth [28] and economy [29], income and wealth distributions [6], languages [30], etc. (see Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%