Law, technology, and data‐driven security: infra‐legalities as method assemblage

Abstract

As complex data-driven systems are increasingly used to know and govern global problems, the terrain for socio-legal studies research is rapidly changing. Both 'the social' and 'the legal' are transformed through processes of algorithmic regulation and automated decision making. In the security field, these changes are giving rise to novel global infrastructures for countering potential risks through the extraction, exchange, and analysis of vast amounts of data. This article critically examines the key methodological implications of these data infrastructures for socio-legal research and argues that confronting these challenges requires a different approach to research methods -one that studies regulation and data infrastructures together, that is empirically attuned to socio-material practices and emergent relations, and that is performative rather than representational in orientation. Drawing principally from actor-network theory, materiality-orientated socio-legal work, and critical security studies, this article outlines an experimental 'method assemblage' ('infra-legalities') for knowing and intervening in global security infrastructures and explores the main features of this research approach. The focus of socio-legal studies on 'law in the realThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Is This the Rhizome? Thinking Together with Fleur Johns

“…The contributions gathered here build on, think and engage with various other contemporary interventions in (post-)critical scholarship. We see connections here to further develop with experimental practices of 'Designing-With/In World Politics' (Austin and Leander 2021); with activist initiatives of counter-forensics that work with/in new technologies of sensing and counter-surveillance-of spatial or visual analysis-to expose violence in its many, multiplying modes (as developed by Forensic Architecture, Forensic Oceanography and Border Forensics) 9 ; with those thinking infrastructurally about how law and authority are enacted (and could be channelled differently) (Sullivan 2022); those tinkering with algorithmic thresholds (cf. Amoore 2020) or building architectures of 'active form' (Easterling 2012); those thinking technically about a form of 'political subjectivity that does not organize at the threshold of existing perceptions of difference' (Amaro and Khan 2020); those reconfiguring responsibility and power through the 'vibrant matters' that compose our worlds and mediate our politics (Bennett 2009).…”

Smooth Operators, Predictable Glitches: The Interface Governance of Benefits and Borders

“…Second, to resist the simplicity of dichotomization, scholars would benefit from extending their methods and theoretical approaches from socio-legal to socio-legal-technical ones. Literature in this growing field now more explicitly adopts network analyses to study how administrative agencies operate and how they are reshaped by data-driven tools (Levi and Valverde 2008; Sullivan 2022). But more could be done to explicitly link the methods and theories from actor network theory and science and technology studies with those developed by infrastructure studies (Bowker and Star 2000) and sociologically driven tools of government literature (Dunleavy et al 2006).…”

“…This article draws on evidence collected from an ongoing study of how digitalization impacts front-line decision-making. It uses a multi-site approach that draws observations from an expansive networked field (Sullivan 2022). Because digital government tools, such as interfaces, link to and are constituted by broader algorithmic and administrative systems, they cannot be studied in isolation or located at one research site.…”

Book review forum: Infrastructure

“…If one accepts this premise, Valverde’s approach to examining the legal dimensions of infrastructure (i.e. ‘infralegalities’, as Sullivan (2022) terms them) used throughout the book will be relatively straightforward. Each chapter engages a term that has entered our vernacular, then unpacks the ways in which these terms, and the infrastructures to which they refer, smuggle in uninterrogated assumptions, practices, and contradictions that illuminate the concealed infrastructural work that law is doing.…”