Law After the Welfare State: Formalism, Functionalism, and the Ironic Turn of Reflexive Law

Abstract

This paper analyzes the contemporary emergence of neo-formalist and neo-functionalist approaches to law-making at a time when the state is seeking to reassert, reformulate and reconceptualize its regulatory competence, both domestically and transnationally.While the earlier turn to alternative regulation modes, conceptualized under the heading of "legal pluralism," "responsive law," or "reflexive law" in the 1970s and 1980s, had aimed at a more socially responsive, contextualized, and ultimately learning mode of legal intervention, the contemporary revival of functionalist jurisprudence and its reliance on "social norms" embraces a limitation model of legal regulation. After revisiting the Legal Realist critique of Formalism and the formulation of functionalist regulation as a progressive agenda, this paper reflects on both the American and German justifications of market regulation and the Welfare State in order to trace the different evolution towards 'responsive law' and legal pluralism in the U.S. and 'post-interventionist' and 'reflexive' law in Germany. This comparison allows for an identification of the emerging transnational qualities of legal normativity in the face of a declining welfare state paradigm, which -at the beginning of the 21st century -appears to provide the stage for turning the progressive gains of the former era into a set of market-oriented justifications of private autonomy and de-regulation.Sfb 597 "Staatlichkeit im Wandel" -"Transformations of the State" (WP 82)

Emanations of the informational state: Cyber operations and the difficulties

“…It has pragmatic uses, as when the EU thinks in terms of emanations to describe transfers of power, whether from the EU to states or in the other direction. The notion can also be abstractly provocative, as in Zumbansen's (2008) discussion of the reflexive ways in which government and governance are moving away from the state. For Henrikson (1981), the "aura" generated by soft power via persuasive campaigns comprises the emanations of the state.…”

Knowledge in Development, Law and Regulation, or How are We to Distinguish between the Economic and the Non-Economic?

“…Productively inspired by the early frustration vis-à-vis the failed attempts to make available a set of tested legal theories to the legal-political challenges in a development context, 113 the task today seems to be similar, yet amplified. Not only has the design of a regulatory framework that would arguably befit a progressive political agenda become much more elusive, given the troubled and ironic reversal of post-Welfare State liberal legal theory into neo-liberal functionalism, 114 but also the reference field for the construction of such a framework has become decisively more differentiated and complex. While it is still true, that a concept such as the 'rule of law' can and should, particularly in the context of development, be understood as a platform for contestation and critical engagement with competing viewpoints and interests, 115 we are today seemingly asked to reflect on even more aspects of the Rule of Law (RoL) model than before.…”

Transnational comparisons: theory and practice of comparative law as a critique of global governance

“…Two developments seem highly promising in that regard: the emergence of the so-called New Legal Realism [NLR] and the increasingly influential field of ethnography of human rights law. The former is coined, in particular, by a progressive interest in making sense of two overlapping and co-evolving developments: one concerns the 'ironic turn' of the legal realist legacy, 49 opening -as it were -the gates not only for critical legal studies, critical race theory or 'third world approaches to international law' but also for conservatively minded undertakings such as 'law & economics' 50 or 'social norms theory.' 51 The other development which NLR is interested in is the dramatic transformation of traditional, state-centred law-making: in response to the far reaching effects of privatization, deregulation and transnationalization of normgeneration, NLR seeks to revive legal sociological and legal pluralist as well as empirical and clinical law approaches to further scrutinize the nature of the emerging normative order.…”