2018
DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2018.1531853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Launching motivation for mindfulness: introducing mindfulness to early childhood preservice teachers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is significant since rigorous empirical evaluations of stress and well-being related programs for preservice teachers are currently scarce (Birchinall et al, 2019). Importantly, existing research which examined preservice teacher outcomes following their participation in other skills-based resilience building interventions reported positive psychosocial and well-being-related benefits in qualitative (e.g., Olsen, 2017; Woloshyn & Savage, 2020), quantitative (e.g., Hue & Lau, 2015; Vesely et al, 2014), and mixed-methods studies (e.g., Beers Dewhirst & Goldman, 2020). For example, Vesely et al (2014) evaluated an emotional intelligence program for preservice teachers and reported significant improvements in domains related to emotion regulation, although no changes were reported for stress, anxiety, or well-being following the program (Vesely et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is significant since rigorous empirical evaluations of stress and well-being related programs for preservice teachers are currently scarce (Birchinall et al, 2019). Importantly, existing research which examined preservice teacher outcomes following their participation in other skills-based resilience building interventions reported positive psychosocial and well-being-related benefits in qualitative (e.g., Olsen, 2017; Woloshyn & Savage, 2020), quantitative (e.g., Hue & Lau, 2015; Vesely et al, 2014), and mixed-methods studies (e.g., Beers Dewhirst & Goldman, 2020). For example, Vesely et al (2014) evaluated an emotional intelligence program for preservice teachers and reported significant improvements in domains related to emotion regulation, although no changes were reported for stress, anxiety, or well-being following the program (Vesely et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research in the "mindfulness in education strand" (Table 2) includes nine studies framed in a post-positivist (Garner et al, 2018;Tarrasch, 2019;Dewhirst and Goldman, 2020), constructivist (Burrows, 2017;Hartigan, 2017), or pragmatic paradigm (Jennings et al, 2011;Newsome et al, 2012;Hue and Lau, 2015), according to Creswell's (2003) classification, with a predominance of quantitative and mixed-methods approaches integrating experimental designs (Jennings et al, 2011;Newsome et al, 2012;Hue and Lau, 2015;Kerr et al, 2017;Garner et al, 2018;Tarrasch, 2019;Dewhirst and Goldman, 2020), a case study (Hartigan, 2017) or a phenomenological In-depth interviews. Adapted from the Mindfulness Based Living Course (MBLC) (Nairn, 2009) study (Burrows, 2017).…”
Section: Mindfulness In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 71 Teachers can form a more complete pro-social classroom and more student teaching outcomes after a series of mindfulness exercises. 72 However, with the reforms within the education system, the administrative work of teachers has been strengthened, and without a higher level of mindfulness, this will inevitably distract teachers from the quality of education. 73 This inevitably leads to the contradiction between labor and human nature, which leads to self-alienation.…”
Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%