2017
DOI: 10.1080/17482798.2017.1312470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laugh away, he is gay! Heteronormativity and children’s television in Denmark

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This article extends the empirical practices of Queer Media Studies by incorporating methodologies from the growing field of Queer Production Studies (e.g. Aslinger, 2009; Martin, 2015, 2018; Thorfinnsdottir and Jensen, 2017; Kerrigan and O’Brien, 2018; 2020). Queer Production Studies has engaged with various facets of the culture industries and has incorporated various methodological approaches scrutinising LGBT+ sexual identity in relation to various aspects of the media industry and the production process (O’Brien and Kerrigan, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article extends the empirical practices of Queer Media Studies by incorporating methodologies from the growing field of Queer Production Studies (e.g. Aslinger, 2009; Martin, 2015, 2018; Thorfinnsdottir and Jensen, 2017; Kerrigan and O’Brien, 2018; 2020). Queer Production Studies has engaged with various facets of the culture industries and has incorporated various methodological approaches scrutinising LGBT+ sexual identity in relation to various aspects of the media industry and the production process (O’Brien and Kerrigan, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct interactions with the industry, in turn, enable queer interventions in the systems of meaning that structure the relation between fictional LGBT+ representations and wider societal assumptions on the reality of sexual and gender diversity. Hence, the present analysis builds on previous research, like Dhoest’s (2015), Martin’s (2015) or Thorfinnsdottir and Jensen’s (2017) studies, in explicitly taking the dissonances between academic and industrial practice – noted by all cited authors – as a core interest. The goal of incorporating professionals’ views on LGBT+ representations is not only to explore the discourses television professionals subscribe to when reflecting on the representation of sexual and gender diversity, but the kind of politics they invite queer television scholars to engage in too (Doty, 1993).…”
Section: Producing Lgbt+ Representationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This was almost always in relation to younger viewers, building on a widespread discourse that young adults growing up gender-and sexually-diverse are perceived not to have enough access to on-screen role models that benefit self-esteem and a sense of belonging (Lipton, 2008). The statement reflects a phenomenon encountered internationally in which media stakeholders' views reflect those that circulated in popular discourse and journalism years earlier (Thorfinnsdottir and Jensen, 2017), perhaps pointing in some respects to the longer development period of some media texts, which can sometimes be years from the initiation of a screenplay to the release of a film-that is, years in which sociocultural perceptions and norms relationg to young people's experiences and the wider media environment may shift. From a Queer theory perspective that is attentive to the constitutive force of mediated identity representations (Cover, 2000), it is notable that the norms that make certain kinds of visibility positive or negative are not necessarily taken up and utilised in identity performances along binary lines; that is, reclaiming a negative representation can, at times, be utilised in positive identity formation (Butler, 1993).…”
Section: Positive and Negative Visibilitiesmentioning
confidence: 93%