2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c01610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lattice Resonances for Thermoplasmonics

Abstract: Thanks to their ability to support localized surface plasmons, metallic nanostructures have emerged as ideal tools to transduce light into heat at the nanoscale, giving birth to the field of thermoplasmonics. When arranged in a periodic array, the localized plasmons of metallic nanostructures can interact coherently to generate a collective mode known as a lattice resonance. This collective mode, whose wavelength is controlled by the periodicity of the array, produces a stronger and more spectrally narrow opti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, the size of the nanoparticles forming the arrays under consideration are significantly smaller than a. Consequently, their localized plasmons are spectrally located far from the lattice resonances, thus ensuring that the latter are highly collective. 30,76 Furthermore, under these conditions, we can describe the optical response of the array using the well-established coupled dipole model (CDM). 4,5,9,77−80 Within this semianalytical approach, each nanoparticle is modeled as a point dipole with both electric and magnetic components, and the collective response of the array arises from the self-consistent mutual interaction between the dipoles.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Importantly, the size of the nanoparticles forming the arrays under consideration are significantly smaller than a. Consequently, their localized plasmons are spectrally located far from the lattice resonances, thus ensuring that the latter are highly collective. 30,76 Furthermore, under these conditions, we can describe the optical response of the array using the well-established coupled dipole model (CDM). 4,5,9,77−80 Within this semianalytical approach, each nanoparticle is modeled as a point dipole with both electric and magnetic components, and the collective response of the array arises from the self-consistent mutual interaction between the dipoles.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…90 The results of this work provide a strong theoretical understanding of the chiral response of the lattice resonances supported by structurally achiral 2.5-dimensional arrays, and therefore are expected to have far-reaching implications from an application point of view. For example, the dissymmetry in absorbance displayed by these systems upon excitation with light of different handedness could be exploited in thermoplasmonics applications 30 as a mechanism to control the heating of the array. Similarly, invoking reciprocity arguments, this same dissymmetry could be utilized to implement arrays emitting thermal radiation with nonvanishing optical helicity, 91 or, if supplemented with a gain medium, sources of chiral light.…”
Section: ■ Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since it is known how the array size limits the possibility to observe SLRs, [ 31,32 ] in Figure S1 (Supporting Information), we also show how the c‐SLR intensity is significantly reduced when switching to a smaller array of 20 × 20 elements, corresponding to a patterned area of 100 µm 2 . The effect of increased size, up to 42 × 42 elements is also discussed in Section S1 (Supporting Information) and reported in Figure S1 (Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%