1998
DOI: 10.1205/026387698524730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lattice-Gas Automata Methods for Engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sub-volumes are grouped as micro blocks in to various sizes. The following for sub-volume sizes, (4,4,4), (6,4,4), (12,4,4) and (29,4,4), were used in the simulations. The nodes in the sub-volume is defined as Keeping the ∆T at 0.015, 0.0165, 0.0175 and 0.0185, various sub-volume sizes were analysed.…”
Section: Effect Of Sub-volume Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sub-volumes are grouped as micro blocks in to various sizes. The following for sub-volume sizes, (4,4,4), (6,4,4), (12,4,4) and (29,4,4), were used in the simulations. The nodes in the sub-volume is defined as Keeping the ∆T at 0.015, 0.0165, 0.0175 and 0.0185, various sub-volume sizes were analysed.…”
Section: Effect Of Sub-volume Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will also enable us to verify the accuracy of previous simulation results. For each of the sub-volume size (4, 4, 4), (6,4,4), (12,4,4), (29, 4, 4) simulations were carried out with different ∆T values. Viscosity fluctuation as a function of temperature difference (∆T) range is plotted in figure 6.…”
Section: Effect Of Temperature Difference (∆T)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the success of the LGM (Biggs and Humby, 1998;Rivet and Boon, 2001), there are a number of difficulties in applying the LGM and this has lead to the development of the LBM. Below a number of these problems and their solution in the LBM are briefly considered, with particular attention to the simulations presented here and the work of Horiguchi et al (2003) (HTY).…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Lattice gas automaton is known as having advantage to complex fluids modeling capability, treatment of flexible boundary condition, and high parallelism in calculation for which usual CFD code mostly fails. But as for the applications of LGA to engineering, it was demonstrated by the survey of Biggs et al 3) that far more work is required before it is suitable for general use. Nevertheless, recently, there has been studied a number of engineering applications of LGA concerned with immiscible lattice-gas (ILG) model proposed by Rothman and Keller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%