2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.74.144111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lattice dynamics study of scheelite tungstates under high pressure I.BaWO4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

22
87
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
22
87
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we must note that there are three groups of bands with negative pressure coefficient: the lowest-frequency lattice modes; a group of lattice modes between 165 and 190 cm −1 ; and the group of the highest bending modes near 540 cm −1 . We think that this last group could correspond to the highest bending modes of the C2/c structure, because similar bands above 400 cm −1 were observed for tungstates of the ABO 4 family with a monoclinic structure [37,38].…”
Section: Pressure Evolution Of Raman Spectrasupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, we must note that there are three groups of bands with negative pressure coefficient: the lowest-frequency lattice modes; a group of lattice modes between 165 and 190 cm −1 ; and the group of the highest bending modes near 540 cm −1 . We think that this last group could correspond to the highest bending modes of the C2/c structure, because similar bands above 400 cm −1 were observed for tungstates of the ABO 4 family with a monoclinic structure [37,38].…”
Section: Pressure Evolution Of Raman Spectrasupporting
confidence: 62%
“…However, besides taking into account the crossing of enthalpy curves which provide the theoretical coexistence pressures for pressure-driven phase transitions, it is also important to realize that the existence of kinetic barriers does hinder (quite severely in many cases) a massively firstorder solid-solid phase transition, which involves large atomic rearrangements. This is the case, for example, of the BaWO 4 and PbWO 4 ternary oxides, where a barrierless second-order scheelite-to-fergusonite transition takes place instead of the ab initio predicted transition from the scheelite-type phase to the BaWO 4 -II-type (PbWO 4 -III-type) phase, the latter structure being only observed in x-ray experiments performed at rather higher pressures [37,38,42]. Although the Bi 2 (MoO 4 ) 3 -type phase is more stable than the α phase at pressures above 3.8 GPa, both structures have a completely different ordering of cations and vacancies [3], and thus the α-to-Bi 2 (MO 4 ) 3 -type transition should be kinetically hindered and rather unlikely at the predicted coexistence pressure.…”
Section: Pressure Evolution Of Raman Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is noteworthy that the Raman spectra of the high-pressure phase of bulk PbMoO 4 are characterized by a gap between 500 and 650 cm À1 without first-order Raman bands. This feature has been already observed in the fergusonite phase of tungstates 7,9 and, together with the similar phase transition arrows indicate the first-order (secondorder) Raman modes of the fergusonite phase. Black (red) asterisks correspond to first-order (second-order) Raman modes of the remaining scheelite phase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…7,8 These phase transitions are common to AWO 4 compounds with A ¼ Ca, Sr, and Ba. [8][9][10] Since AWO 4 and AMoO 4 compounds are very similar from crystal chemical considerations, 6 we expect that PbMoO 4 undergoes pressure-induced phase transitions similar to those of PbWO 4 and related to those that have been already found in CaMoO 4 , SrMoO 4 , CdMoO 4 , EuMoO 4 , and BaMoO 4 . [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Wulfenite was studied at high pressures by Raman scattering up to 3.5 GPa in the late 1970s by Ganguly and Nicol using NaCl as pressure-transmitting medium, and no phase transition was observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation