2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lattice Discrete Particle Modeling of concrete coupled creep and shrinkage behavior: A comprehensive calibration and validation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar work was also found in Abdellatef et al (2019). Although exhibiting sufficient accuracy, the lattice discrete particle model adopted in Boumakis et al and Abdellatef et al (2019) essentially is not a continuum model and is not suitable for structural analysis. Li et al (2019) realized the nonlinear time-dependent analysis of prestressed concrete bridges considering cracking, creep, and shrinkage within the framework of Abaqus/Standard.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar work was also found in Abdellatef et al (2019). Although exhibiting sufficient accuracy, the lattice discrete particle model adopted in Boumakis et al and Abdellatef et al (2019) essentially is not a continuum model and is not suitable for structural analysis. Li et al (2019) realized the nonlinear time-dependent analysis of prestressed concrete bridges considering cracking, creep, and shrinkage within the framework of Abaqus/Standard.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Recently, Luzio′s continuum method was replaced with a discrete element model in the work by Boumakis et al (2018). Similar work was also found in Abdellatef et al (2019). Although exhibiting sufficient accuracy, the lattice discrete particle model adopted in Boumakis et al and Abdellatef et al (2019) essentially is not a continuum model and is not suitable for structural analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For these reasons, the discrete approaches are more effective compared to continuum approaches, yet of course they are more computationally demanding. Based on the authors experience in using both the discrete (1D conduit) scheme and the FE continuum (3D tetrahedral elements) scheme in many previous research applications concerning aging, creep, shrinkage and Alkali Silica Reaction (ASR) problems [32,33,34,35,36], they noticed that the discrete mesh requires no more than 50% of computational time compared to continuum mesh with similar refinement. This difference has not been quantitatively evaluated but the authors have consistently observed it in their work.…”
Section: Significance Of the Proposed Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For details on the calibration and validation of this theory see [39]. This model was coupled in many research works with LDPM to successfully represent and predict concrete long term behavior under coupled shrinkage, creep, ASR degradation [76,77,34,35,36,78,79,32,33].…”
Section: Coupling With the Htc Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to simulate the crack initiation and propagation during fracture of cementitious materials, attention should be paid to the determination of input parameters. Recently, research concerning the calibration and validation in LDPM [42,43] shows great success in lattice modeling. LBM input parameters necessary for fracture simulation are described below, together with their effect on the macroscopic model response.…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%