2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.04.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lattice Boltzmann method for conjugate heat and mass transfer with interfacial jump conditions

Abstract: 2016-11-02T18:49:00

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
62
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(75 reference statements)
4
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no obvious difference between them. The continuity of temperature and of temperature gradient across the interface of solid media can be guaranteed exactly in the present numerical prediction, which is important for conjugate heat transfer simulation [17][18][19][20][21]. Furthermore, in the models proposed in Refs.…”
Section: Conjugate Heat Transfer Between Solid Mediamentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There is no obvious difference between them. The continuity of temperature and of temperature gradient across the interface of solid media can be guaranteed exactly in the present numerical prediction, which is important for conjugate heat transfer simulation [17][18][19][20][21]. Furthermore, in the models proposed in Refs.…”
Section: Conjugate Heat Transfer Between Solid Mediamentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Moreover, the present model can be directly used for conjugate heat transfer simulation, without any modification. Compared with some of the available LB approaches for conjugate heat transfer simulation [17][18][19][20], the present model is easier to be implemented as here no interface should be treated explicitly. Although the complexity induced by interface treatment can be avoided in several previous LB models [21,22], they suffer a number of obvious shortcomings.…”
Section: Multiscale Expansion and Recovered Macroscopic Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where ΔT is a reference temperature introduced to normalize the physical temperature, i.e., and Γ t should be adjusted to constrain η D in a reasonable range, e.g, 0.501 < η D < 2.0 [31][32][33][34][35][36]. Two numerical tests will be presented in the beginning of Section 5 to validate the scaling strategy in the LB modeling.…”
Section: Scaling Between the Physical And Lb Unit Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%