We report on ballistic electron emission microscopy and spectroscopy studies on epitaxial (3-5 nm thick) Bi(111) films, grown on n-type Si substrates. The effective barrier heights of the Schottky barrier observed are 0.58 eV for the Bi=Sið100Þ-ð2 Â 1Þ and 0.68 eV for the Bi=Sið111Þ-ð7 Â 7Þ. At the step edges of the epitaxial films a strong increase of the ballistic electron emission microscopy current is observed for Bi=Sið111Þ-ð7 Â 7Þ, while no increase occurs for Bi=Sið100Þ-ð2 Â 1Þ. These observations can be explained by the conservation of the lateral momentum of the electron at the metal-semiconductor interface. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.136807 PACS numbers: 73.23.Ad, 73.20.At, 73.30.+y, 73.40.Àc Since the invention of ballistic electron emission microscopy (BEEM) by Bell and Kaiser two decades ago [1,2], studies on the conservation of lateral electron momentum at the interface formed between metals and semiconductors have remained puzzling. Schowalter and Lee [3,4] studied ballistic electron emission spectroscopy (BEES) for Au films grown on Si substrates with different crystallographic orientations. Assuming that the lateral electron momentum at the metal-semiconductor interface is conserved [2] the BEEM currents were expected to differ dramatically due to different projections of the conduction band minima of the Si on the (111) and (100) plane. However, almost identical BEEM currents were measured. These results were later confirmed by Weilmeier et al. [5,6]. In the case of Pd on Si, Ludeke and Bauer [7] attributed the observed equality of transmission across (111) and (100) to interface scattering randomizing the electron momentum. As discussed by García-Vidal et al.[8] and Bell [9], the results found on Au samples may be explained without additional electronic scattering processes, because the electronic band structure of the transition metals (Au, Ag, Pd, etc.) exhibits a band gap in the [111] direction, requiring a minimal lateral component of the electronic momentum. Taking into account the matching conditions at the metal-semiconductor interface, they predicted a similar onset for the BEEM current, but a higher intensity for Au=Sið111Þ in agreement with the experiments.A different situation is found with CoSi 2 =Sið100Þ versus CoSi 2 =Sið111Þ. The band structure of CoSi 2 allows the propagation of electrons at k k ¼ 0, and due to the excellent quality of the epitaxial layers there is very little diffuse scattering of electrons. The latter is confirmed by the high resolution of detail at the metal-semiconductor interface obtained by BEEM imaging [10], indicating that the electrons are limited to a very small cone within the CoSi 2 . A theoretical description by García-Vidal et al. [8,[11][12][13][14] could explain the high spatial resolution for BEEM and has predicted that the onset for the BEEM current should be shifted for the (111) versus the (100) substrate, due to the conservation of the lateral momentum at the interface. However, the experimental results for the BEEM current are contra...