2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01094.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latitudinal Variation in Sexual Size Dimorphism of Sea-Run Masu Salmon, Oncorhynchus Masou

Abstract: Abstract. Sexual size dimorphism (SSD), a difference in body size between the sexes, occurs in many animal species. Although the larger sex is often considered invariable within species, patterns of selection may result in interpopulation variation or even reversal of SSD. We evaluated correlations between latitude and female body size, male body size, and relative body size (male body size/female body size) in 22 populations (ranging from 37ЊN to 49ЊN) of sea-run masu salmon (Oncorhynchus masou) that spawn in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though fecundity selection in L. a. agilis is likely stronger than in L. a. exigua , FAH cannot solely explain the more female‐biased SSD of L. a. agilis because the SSD difference is primarily due to a shift in male rather than female size. Such a pattern, which corresponds to Rensch's rule (Fairbairn, ), is usually explained via geographic differences in sexual selection (Pearson et al ., ; Tamate & Maekawa, ; Puniamoorthy et al ., ). Yet the currently available evidence for sexual selection for larger male size being weaker in L. a. agilis than in L. a. exigua is poor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though fecundity selection in L. a. agilis is likely stronger than in L. a. exigua , FAH cannot solely explain the more female‐biased SSD of L. a. agilis because the SSD difference is primarily due to a shift in male rather than female size. Such a pattern, which corresponds to Rensch's rule (Fairbairn, ), is usually explained via geographic differences in sexual selection (Pearson et al ., ; Tamate & Maekawa, ; Puniamoorthy et al ., ). Yet the currently available evidence for sexual selection for larger male size being weaker in L. a. agilis than in L. a. exigua is poor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other studies have failed to detect sexual dimorphism in behaviour, growth, or size at early life history stages (e.g., [28,29]). Whereas different degrees and forms of SSD appears to be common at sexual maturity [4,5], it may be variable in its expression during development or simply may be too small to be easily detected at early life history stages. It seems likely that the form and degree of SSD varies across life history stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, there is interest in whether sex-specific differences during development represent a correlated response to sexual selection acting on adults or different optima for males and females [2,3]. In adult Pacific salmon in the genus Oncorhynchus , both male-biased and female-biased SSD is represented, depending on the species and population [4,5]. Among species, SSD ranges from male-biased values in which males are 4% larger than females (in chum salmon O. keta [Walbaum in Artedi, 1792]) to female-biased values in which males are 9% smaller than females (in Chinook salmon O. tshawytscha [Walbaum in Artedi, 1792])[4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young (2005) and Tamate and Maekawa (2006) reported a parallel variation in male and female size of Pacific salmon and trout Oncorhynchus spp. Young (2005) and Tamate and Maekawa (2006) reported a parallel variation in male and female size of Pacific salmon and trout Oncorhynchus spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%