2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2011.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latitudinal profile of UV nightglow and electron precipitations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy deposition of precipitating particles of various energies mainly through the ionization of atmospheric atoms occurs at different altitudes, particularly within the D, E, and F regions of the ionosphere and extends from high to midlatitudes and over the South-Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) at low latitudes [e.g., Voss and Smith, 1980;Vampola and Gorney, 1983;Rees et al, 1988;Abel et al, 1997]. An impact of precipitating particles in the lower ionosphere (the D and E layers) and the upper atmosphere in terms of enhanced ionization and other related aeronomical effects has been investigated in a large number of studies [e.g., Buonsanto, 1999, and references therein;Nishino et al, 2002;Peter et al, 2006;Clilverd et al, 2008Clilverd et al, , 2010Turunen et al, 2009;Lam et al, 2010;Dmitriev et al, 2011], while evidence for ionospheric signatures in the topside ionosphere (F region) in the midlatitudes and over the SAA at low latitudes have also been reported [e.g., Foster et al, 1994Foster et al, , 1998Abdu et al, 2005;Kunitsyn et al, 2008aKunitsyn et al, , 2008bDmitriev and Yeh, 2008;Pedatella et al, 2009;Ngwira et al, 2012].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy deposition of precipitating particles of various energies mainly through the ionization of atmospheric atoms occurs at different altitudes, particularly within the D, E, and F regions of the ionosphere and extends from high to midlatitudes and over the South-Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) at low latitudes [e.g., Voss and Smith, 1980;Vampola and Gorney, 1983;Rees et al, 1988;Abel et al, 1997]. An impact of precipitating particles in the lower ionosphere (the D and E layers) and the upper atmosphere in terms of enhanced ionization and other related aeronomical effects has been investigated in a large number of studies [e.g., Buonsanto, 1999, and references therein;Nishino et al, 2002;Peter et al, 2006;Clilverd et al, 2008Clilverd et al, , 2010Turunen et al, 2009;Lam et al, 2010;Dmitriev et al, 2011], while evidence for ionospheric signatures in the topside ionosphere (F region) in the midlatitudes and over the SAA at low latitudes have also been reported [e.g., Foster et al, 1994Foster et al, , 1998Abdu et al, 2005;Kunitsyn et al, 2008aKunitsyn et al, , 2008bDmitriev and Yeh, 2008;Pedatella et al, 2009;Ngwira et al, 2012].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis of the ion temperature and drift velocity in the SAA region shows that the ion enhancements are accompanied by the enhanced temperature 33 . Plasma heating leads to an increase in recombination at the heights of the F layer, and to density depletion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While at high geomagnetic latitudes (L > 4) the UV emission observed can be explained by e precipitation, at low geomagnetic latitudes (L < 2.5) the UV enhancements are higher than those expected just from e precipitation -other mechanism is needed for explanation. [37] concludes that the origin of UV enhancements at middle latitudes (2 < L < 4) is still unclear and requires further studies. Simultaneous measurement of UV, energetic e and other high energy particles on Tatiana 1 and 2 satellites allowed to obtain several results important also for understanding the energetic particle dynamics in near-Earth space [39].…”
Section: Energetic Electrons and Uv Fluxmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The analysis led to the conclusion that the mean intensity of UV radiation at high latitudes is correlated with the e fluxes (UV increases observed at higher latitudes than those of e), but it is not the case with the SAA [36]. Statistical analysis found three latitudinal regions of enhanced UV emission [37]. While at high geomagnetic latitudes (L > 4) the UV emission observed can be explained by e precipitation, at low geomagnetic latitudes (L < 2.5) the UV enhancements are higher than those expected just from e precipitation -other mechanism is needed for explanation.…”
Section: Energetic Electrons and Uv Fluxmentioning
confidence: 98%