2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latitudinal gradient of spruce forest understory and tundra phenology in Alaska as observed from satellite and ground-based data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We were able to predict SOS within seven days and EOS within 10 days with ground cameras with similar results being reported in Baumann et al () and Nijland et al (). The better results for SOS compared to EOS may be related to the SOS signal being stronger than the EOS signal (Nijland et al, ) and may also relate to lower solar elevation and sun angle at EOS and there being a stronger signal from conifer species as sun cannot penetrate to the understorey (Kobayashi et al, ). The correlation between DRIVE and ground camera data across 17 forested and non‐forested sites with varying species composition displays its ability to capture spatial patterns in vegetation across our study area beyond simple elevation trends.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We were able to predict SOS within seven days and EOS within 10 days with ground cameras with similar results being reported in Baumann et al () and Nijland et al (). The better results for SOS compared to EOS may be related to the SOS signal being stronger than the EOS signal (Nijland et al, ) and may also relate to lower solar elevation and sun angle at EOS and there being a stronger signal from conifer species as sun cannot penetrate to the understorey (Kobayashi et al, ). The correlation between DRIVE and ground camera data across 17 forested and non‐forested sites with varying species composition displays its ability to capture spatial patterns in vegetation across our study area beyond simple elevation trends.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also allows objective capture of vegetation phases that can be analyzed visually by users or by automatic algorithms. Networks of cameras can be established on a seasonal (Nijland et al, ) or permanent basis (The Phenocam Network) (Richardson et al, ) and have been shown to be useful for tracking green‐up and senescence of key vegetative food species (Bater et al, ; Laskin, ; Nijland et al, ). Despite its high temporal resolution and accuracy, time‐lapse photography still lacks the spatially explicit information to measure vegetation cycles continuously in space and time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Kobayashi et al. ). Phenological metrics derived via color indices from camera images have been compared in prior studies to in situ observations in a few sites (Keenan et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A1). However, in these more western areas, vegetation changes to rather erect dwarf shrubs and graminoids (Walker et al, 2005, their We speculate that possible explanations for this might be an increasing effect of low SZA late in the growing season (Kobayashi et al, 2016) affecting low NDVI in particularly sparse vegetation heavily. NDVI might also be strongly decreased by standing surface water (Gamon et al, 2013) from snow melt or intermittent precipitation that has not yet drained or evaporated until later in the growing season.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%