2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2017.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latitudinal distribution of zooplankton communities in the Western Pacific along 160°E during summer 2014

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be one of the reasons why the number of species in the present study is somewhat higher than in the study of Dai et al Similar to the findings of Dai et al [17] and Yang et al [18], copepods and Chaetognaths are the dominant taxa in the Western Pacific. However, as shown in Table 3, the zooplankton abundance in this survey was more consistent with the results of Yang et al [18] and Sun et al [19] and much higher than the results of Dai et al [17]. This may be related to the different methods used in the survey [36,37].…”
Section: Comparison With Historical Datasupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be one of the reasons why the number of species in the present study is somewhat higher than in the study of Dai et al Similar to the findings of Dai et al [17] and Yang et al [18], copepods and Chaetognaths are the dominant taxa in the Western Pacific. However, as shown in Table 3, the zooplankton abundance in this survey was more consistent with the results of Yang et al [18] and Sun et al [19] and much higher than the results of Dai et al [17]. This may be related to the different methods used in the survey [36,37].…”
Section: Comparison With Historical Datasupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For S1 and S2, zooplankton abundance was the highest in the NECC region and lowest in the STCC region, in agreement with the results of Yang et al [18]. However, this is not consistent with the findings of Sun et al [19] that community abundance generally increases with increasing latitude [19]. However, a decreasing value of zooplankton abundance between 20 • N and 30 • N can also be seen in the graphs in their study.…”
Section: Relationship Between Ocean Current Factors and Zooplanktonsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Early Pacific studies surveyed only the distribution of zooplankton, including copepods, and major water mass structures were a key factor in determining zooplankton biogeography [16,17]. The whole copepod community was analyzed only in a specific region, and a relatively few large-scale studies were conducted in the Pacific, such as those that compared the copepod community between north and south subtropical circulation [18], or studied the latitudinal patterns of copepods from the equator to subarctic at 160˚E [19]. Calanoid community and its diversity were investigated from epipelagic (0-200 m) to bathypelagic (1,000-4,000 m) layers at 12 stations in the North Pacific [20], whereas large-scale studies on copepod communities across the Pacific are limited below the epipelagic layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In early studies in the Pacific, only major species of zooplankton including copepods were examined for their distribution, and major water mass structures were a key factor in determining zooplankton biogeography [16, 17]. Whole-community analyses of copepods have only been carried out in specific areas, and there are relatively few large-scale studies in the Pacific; Williamson and McGowan compared copepod communities between north and south subtropical gyres [18], and Sun and Wang studied latitudinal patterns of copepods from the equator to subarctic regions along 160°E [19]. Calanoid copepod community and diversity have also been investigated from epipelagic (0–200 m) to bathypelagic (1,000–4,000 m) layers at 12 stations in the North Pacific [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%