2004
DOI: 10.1007/s10872-004-5770-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latitudinal Differences in the Planktonic Biomass and Community Structure Down to the Greater Depths in the Western North Pacific

Abstract: As part of the research program WEST-COSMIC Phase I (1997, vertical profiles down to the greater depths (0-2000 m or 5800 m) of the plankton community structure composed of heterotrophic bacteria, phytoplankton, protozooplankton and metazooplankton were studied at one station in each subarctic (44˚N) and in transitional region (39˚N), and two stations in subtropical region (30˚N and 25˚N); all in 137-155˚E in the western North Pacific Ocean. The biomass of all four taxonomic groups decreased rapidly with incre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
23
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(55 reference statements)
7
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, at a global level, HP biomass decreased clearly with depth, from 280 pg C ml À 1 in the upper mesopelagic layer to 50 pg C ml À 1 in the lower bathypelagic layer. The average biomass for the bathypelagic realm was one order of magnitude larger than the values estimated by Fukuda et al (2007) and Sohrin et al (2010) but similar to other reports (Tanaka and Rassoulzadegan, 2002;Yamaguchi et al, 2004). The biomass ratio between HP and prokaryotes was 0.21 ± 0.05 in the global bathypelagic realm and 0.39 ± 0.08 in the mesopelagic realm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As expected, at a global level, HP biomass decreased clearly with depth, from 280 pg C ml À 1 in the upper mesopelagic layer to 50 pg C ml À 1 in the lower bathypelagic layer. The average biomass for the bathypelagic realm was one order of magnitude larger than the values estimated by Fukuda et al (2007) and Sohrin et al (2010) but similar to other reports (Tanaka and Rassoulzadegan, 2002;Yamaguchi et al, 2004). The biomass ratio between HP and prokaryotes was 0.21 ± 0.05 in the global bathypelagic realm and 0.39 ± 0.08 in the mesopelagic realm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The unprecedented magnitude of our sampling effort (116 stations) and the geographical coverage in our study (Figure 1 prokaryotes, only a handful of studies have enumerated deep HP (Pomeroy and Johannes, 1968;Sorokin, 1985;Tanaka and Rassoulzadegan, 2002;Yamaguchi et al, 2004;Fukuda et al, 2007;Sohrin et al, 2010;Morgan-Smith et al, 2011, 2013, likely because of the time-consuming enumeration techniques required. Here we used FC to estimate the abundance of HP (Christaki et al, 2011), a routine that had not yet been used in large-scale oeanographic surveys.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the mesopelagic, upper-bathypelagic and lower-bathypelagic zones, differences in chemical composition between copepods and net-plankton were not appreciable. Yamaguchi et al (2004) noted that copepods were the major component…”
Section: Copepods Vs Net Planktonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a project, whether small or large scale, would need to start by accumulating base-line information through a deep-sea field survey of biomass, biodiversity [24] and the trophic structure ( Figure 2) together with collection of physicochemical data, in order to evaluate induced ecosystem alterations. These alterations would be reflected in the food-web structure through changes in the trophic position of organisms.…”
Section: Determination Of Ecosystem Alterationsmentioning
confidence: 99%