2010
DOI: 10.1080/00038628.2010.9685341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latitude variation and its influence on rules of thumb in daylighting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a WFR range of 10% to 40% is adopted to restrict glazing areas. A general design rule of thumb for WFR is 20% to 25%, whereas this does not factor in the impacts of the geographical locations of different projects [82]. In this study, the lower bound 10% is a threshold for natural lighting requirements clearly stated in the NCC Volume Two [56].…”
Section: Variable Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, a WFR range of 10% to 40% is adopted to restrict glazing areas. A general design rule of thumb for WFR is 20% to 25%, whereas this does not factor in the impacts of the geographical locations of different projects [82]. In this study, the lower bound 10% is a threshold for natural lighting requirements clearly stated in the NCC Volume Two [56].…”
Section: Variable Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the lower bound 10% is a threshold for natural lighting requirements clearly stated in the NCC Volume Two [56]. Although there is no empirical data that specifies an allowance for WFR in Sydney region, a 10% average daylight factor, which is considered the maximum allowed for the interior [83], was obtained by Ibrahim and Hayman [82] when the WFR was between 30% to 40% in Sydney. In the interest of brevity, this case study took 40% as the upper bound.…”
Section: Variable Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a WFR range of 10% to 40% is adopted to restrict glazing areas. A general design rule of thumb for WFR is 20% to 25%, whereas this does not factor in the impacts of the geographical locations of different projects [35]. In this study, the lower bound 10% is a threshold for natural lighting requirement clearly stated in the NCC Volume Two [54].…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the lower bound 10% is a threshold for natural lighting requirement clearly stated in the NCC Volume Two [54]. Although there is no empirical data that specifies an allowance for WFR in Sydney region, a 10% average daylight factor, which is considered as the maximum allowed for the interior [86], was obtained by Ibrahim & Hayman [35] when the WFR is between 30% to 40% in Sydney. In the interest of brevity, this case study took 40% as the upper bound.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%