2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2005.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latitude gradients in the natural variance in stratospheric conductivity – Implications for studies of long-term changes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(69 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ultrafine aerosol layer has a significant effect on the column resistance after the volcanic eruption. Tinsley (2005) claimed that there was an ultrafine aerosol layer in the upper stratosphere formed by ion media nucleation, as suggested by Yu and Turco(2001), which could be consistent with the unexplained variability on all time scales in measured stratospheric conductivity (Tinsley, 2005;Bering et al, 2005), especially in the descending branch of the Brewer-Dobson circulation at high latitudes. In the GEC model of the TZ06 model, the artificial ultrafine aerosol layer centered at 40 km was modeled based on the numerical simulation by Yu and Turco (2001) for an H 2 SO 4 mass concentration of 6.35 × 10 2 μg m −3 , which corresponds to a mass mixing ratio of 16 ppbm for the liquid droplets.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The ultrafine aerosol layer has a significant effect on the column resistance after the volcanic eruption. Tinsley (2005) claimed that there was an ultrafine aerosol layer in the upper stratosphere formed by ion media nucleation, as suggested by Yu and Turco(2001), which could be consistent with the unexplained variability on all time scales in measured stratospheric conductivity (Tinsley, 2005;Bering et al, 2005), especially in the descending branch of the Brewer-Dobson circulation at high latitudes. In the GEC model of the TZ06 model, the artificial ultrafine aerosol layer centered at 40 km was modeled based on the numerical simulation by Yu and Turco (2001) for an H 2 SO 4 mass concentration of 6.35 × 10 2 μg m −3 , which corresponds to a mass mixing ratio of 16 ppbm for the liquid droplets.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In view of the approximations in this model in the treatment of ultrafine aerosol concentrations and stratospheric ion mobility, it seems premature to make a detailed comparison with balloon measurements of stratospheric conductivity. There is unexplained variability on all timescales in measured stratospheric conductivity [ Tinsley , 2005; Bering et al , 2005, and references therein], especially at high latitudes. The presence at balloon altitudes of small amounts of ultrafine aerosol, and especially of the day‐to‐day variability of the relativistic electron flux and its X‐ray Bremsstrahlung, which can penetrate down to the 25–30 km level [ Frahm et al , 1997]) are both potential sources of such variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the approximations in this model in the treatment of ultrafine aerosol concentrations and stratospheric ion mobility, it seems premature to make a detailed comparison with balloon measurements of stratospheric conductivity. There is unexplained variability on all time scales in measured stratospheric conductivity (Tinsley, 2005;Bering et al, 2005), especially at high latitudes. The presence at balloon altitudes of small amounts of ultrafine aerosol, and especially of the day-to-day variability of the relativistic electron flux and its X-ray Bremsstrahlung, which can penetrate down to the 25-30 km level Frahm et al, 1997) are both potential sources of such variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%