2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latissimus dorsi transfer for irreparable rotator cuff tears: A longitudinal study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
64
1
17

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(57 reference statements)
4
64
1
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, progression of osteoarthritis and decrease of acromiohumeral distance were reported for the latissimus dorsi transfer [10,12,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, progression of osteoarthritis and decrease of acromiohumeral distance were reported for the latissimus dorsi transfer [10,12,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The mean active flexion increased from 119°to 170°, mean abduction from 118°to 169°, and mean external rotation from 19°to 33°. Irlenbusch et al [16] reported continuous improvement in the Constant and Murley score during a 50-month period from 33 points initially to 71 points in patients undergoing primary reconstruction. Range of motion increased with active flexion from 81°to 166°.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aoki [57] found lower results for revision patients but they included in their primary cases patients who had been already operated on with an isolated acromioplasty which is a serious bias to compare revision and primary patients although one might think that those patients being included in revision cases, primary cases might have obtained even more better results.…”
Section: Revision and Primary Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[56] Sooner or later, some authors observed lower outcomes for revision sufferers but they protected of their number one instances patients who were already operated on with an remoted acromioplasty which is an extreme bias to compare revision and primary sufferers even though one may think that the ones sufferers being included in revision cases, primary instances may have obtained even better effects. [57] As a conclusion a majority of authors discovered less favorable consequences for revision patients except detachment and/or atrophy of the anterior deltoid regarded to be a primary danger issue for postoperative decrease results while less competitive preoperative surgical treatment as arthroscopic debridement, acromioplasty or lengthy head of the biceps tenotomy is probably greater favorable. Age, gender very few authors analyzed the effect of age and gender on results of LD tendon transfer.…”
Section: Current Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 95%