2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2012.01251.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latinos and the Skin Color Paradox: Skin Color, National Origin, and Political Attitudes

Abstract: For African Americans and Latinos, skin color is a significant predictor of many social and economic stratification variables including income, education, housing, occupational status, spousal status, poverty rates, criminal justice sentencing, and rates of depression. Given these patterns, some scholars have surprisingly found that skin color is not a significant predictor of many political attitudes for African Americans, and called this phenomenon the “skin color paradox.” This article investigates the role… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(44 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, Mexicans and Puerto Ricans report remarkably lower levels of SES than Cubans. The variation and associated differential prediction for SRMH and SRH across subgroups are consistent with previous findings (Chatterji et al, 2007; Espino & Franz, 2002; Faught & Hunter, 2012; Gonzalez-Barrera & Lopez, 2013; Passel & Cohn, 2009; Pérez et al, 2008; Zsembik & Fennell, 2005). With the Mexican subgroup falling at the bottom of the SES bracket, its pattern lends support for Healey and O’Brien’s (2014) statement on their persistent poverty, resembling African Americans in the U.S. South (e.g., low-wage occupations).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Finally, Mexicans and Puerto Ricans report remarkably lower levels of SES than Cubans. The variation and associated differential prediction for SRMH and SRH across subgroups are consistent with previous findings (Chatterji et al, 2007; Espino & Franz, 2002; Faught & Hunter, 2012; Gonzalez-Barrera & Lopez, 2013; Passel & Cohn, 2009; Pérez et al, 2008; Zsembik & Fennell, 2005). With the Mexican subgroup falling at the bottom of the SES bracket, its pattern lends support for Healey and O’Brien’s (2014) statement on their persistent poverty, resembling African Americans in the U.S. South (e.g., low-wage occupations).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The enhanced Hispanic vulnerability to server mistreatment that we observed in this study may be, for instance, disproportionally driven by heightened levels of prejudice and discrimination toward dark skinned Latino(a) customers (e.g., Mexicans, Puerto Ricans, etc.) rather than Hispanics more generally, as we have implied (Lee and Bean 2007;Faught and Hunter 2012;Bonilla-Silva 2014). 12…”
Section: Limitations Implications and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Research in this line has examined whether skin tone predicts (a) political attitudes and (b) political behaviors (e.g., voting). Hochschild and Weaver (2007) found that skin tone did not predict a range of political attitudes among African Americans—a finding they called the “Skin Color Paradox.” Similarly, Faught and Hunter (2012) as well as Vargas (2018) found that skin tone did not predict politically relevant attitudes among U.S. Latinxs. By contrast, skin tone has been more tied to political behaviors rather than political attitudes .…”
Section: Colonialism Colorism and Politicsmentioning
confidence: 95%