2009
DOI: 10.3366/e174418540900072x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latin American Gender Studies in the Twenty-First Century

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to the predominance of male authors in the Boom, the Post-Boom boasted a large number of female writers, 4 such as Isabel Allende (La casa de los espíritus, 1982), Laura 4 Although some new studies argue that the number of women writers in 20th-century Latin America has been largely overestimated (Castillo, 2009), their presence is still very relevant in this movement, especially because Esquivel (Como agua para chocolate, 1989), and Luisa Valenzuela (Cola de Lagartija, 1983), to name a few. This "sudden" appearance of various novels written by women seems to be a coincidence, but Serrão (2013) claims that the Boom movement was seen as so intellectual, revolutionary, and innovative that texts by women were not considered on the same level as those by men; thus, it was not worth publishing them.…”
Section: Latin American Literary Context: Post-boommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to the predominance of male authors in the Boom, the Post-Boom boasted a large number of female writers, 4 such as Isabel Allende (La casa de los espíritus, 1982), Laura 4 Although some new studies argue that the number of women writers in 20th-century Latin America has been largely overestimated (Castillo, 2009), their presence is still very relevant in this movement, especially because Esquivel (Como agua para chocolate, 1989), and Luisa Valenzuela (Cola de Lagartija, 1983), to name a few. This "sudden" appearance of various novels written by women seems to be a coincidence, but Serrão (2013) claims that the Boom movement was seen as so intellectual, revolutionary, and innovative that texts by women were not considered on the same level as those by men; thus, it was not worth publishing them.…”
Section: Latin American Literary Context: Post-boommentioning
confidence: 99%