2019
DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latin American and Caribbean consensus on noninvasive central nervous system neuromodulation for chronic pain management (LAC2-NIN-CP)

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
66
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
1
66
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-specific LBP is the leading cause of years of unhealthy life in the world [48]. The prognosis of LBP patients is generally good since 90% of people recover within 3 months [45] thanks to a large therapeutic offering [29] including both pharmaceutical (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), opioids, paracetamol) and non-pharmaceutical interventions (massage, physical therapy, acupuncture) [36] including neuromodulation techniques such as repeated Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial Direct Current Stimulations (tDCS) [4].…”
Section: -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-specific LBP is the leading cause of years of unhealthy life in the world [48]. The prognosis of LBP patients is generally good since 90% of people recover within 3 months [45] thanks to a large therapeutic offering [29] including both pharmaceutical (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), opioids, paracetamol) and non-pharmaceutical interventions (massage, physical therapy, acupuncture) [36] including neuromodulation techniques such as repeated Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial Direct Current Stimulations (tDCS) [4].…”
Section: -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, it can help to personalize the therapeutic approach. Despite the absence of a FDA-approved neuromodulation protocol targeted to patients with comorbidity MDD and FM, the effectiveness of neuromodulatory techniques (i.e., tDCS and TMS) has been supported by consistent evidence to treat both FM and depression (Kauffmann et al, 2004; Antal et al, 2010; Brunoni et al, 2011; Marie, 2014; Fagerlund et al, 2015; Castillo-Saavedra et al, 2016; Cheng et al, 2018; Karina do Monte-Silva et al, 2019). Considering that these two disorders are frequently overlapped, it poses a considerable challenge to decide if it would be better to stimulate the M1 or the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex for the treatment of pain accompanied by depression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, high frequency (i.e., more than 5 Hz) rTMS over M1 is the only validated protocol for pain treatment [9,10,39]. Although epidural motor cortex stimulation seems more effective if the motor representation of the painful area is stimulated [40], such somatotopy is not obvious using rTMS [24,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the link between M1 stimulation and pain relief is not obvious at first, M1 can be seen as an entry door into a larger network involved in pain modulation [41]. Concerning other non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for abdominal pain treatment, there is some evidence for the efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex and recent guidelines provided a level B for its use in such pain situation [39]. In the case of rTMS, other possible brain targets for pain relief are under investigation, especially the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or deeper cortical areas [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation