2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2017.12.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latest Cretaceous “A2-type” granites in the Sakarya Zone, NE Turkey: Partial melting of mafic lower crust in response to roll-back of Neo-Tethyan oceanic lithosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our slab rollback model appears to be reasonable at explaining the spatial and temporal variation and compositional transition of the Late Cretaceous magmatism, as well as the presence of the approximately 81‐ to 73‐Ma A 2 ‐type alkaline granitoids with high zircon saturation temperatures (up to 862 °C) in the Pirnalli and Topcam area of the EP (Figure b, Karsli et al, ; Karsli, Caran, et al, ). However, we note that the validity of this model is subject to future work using the data of the coeval mafic rocks and the abundant geochronological data of the Late Cretaceous magmatism in the EP arc.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our slab rollback model appears to be reasonable at explaining the spatial and temporal variation and compositional transition of the Late Cretaceous magmatism, as well as the presence of the approximately 81‐ to 73‐Ma A 2 ‐type alkaline granitoids with high zircon saturation temperatures (up to 862 °C) in the Pirnalli and Topcam area of the EP (Figure b, Karsli et al, ; Karsli, Caran, et al, ). However, we note that the validity of this model is subject to future work using the data of the coeval mafic rocks and the abundant geochronological data of the Late Cretaceous magmatism in the EP arc.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…We note that a slab rollback model associated with the northward subduction of the northern branch of the Neotethys lithosphere has also been proposed to explain the generation of the Late Cretaceous magmatic rocks both in the EP (e.g., Çinku et al, ; Karsli et al, ; Karsli, Caran, et al, ) and the western Pontides (e.g., Aysal et al, ; Keskin & Tüysüz, ) on the basis of an assumed southward migration of magmatism that was inferred from the paleomagnetic data (Çinku et al, ). However, as discussed earlier, existing data indicate that the Late Cretaceous magmatism did not show a simple southward migration but covers a broader region not only in the northern zone (Ordu‐Güdül) but also in the southern zone (Gümüşhane‐Bayburt) of the EP (Figure b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations