2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laterally constrained inversion for CSAMT data interpretation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CSAMT is a hybrid method progressively being used in geotechnical engineering 17 , 31 , 63 66 . It measures subsurface resistivity distribution of the earth’s electric and magnetic fields, mainly due to the time-dependent variations and the high-frequency electromagnetic waves artificially transmitted by non-polarization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CSAMT is a hybrid method progressively being used in geotechnical engineering 17 , 31 , 63 66 . It measures subsurface resistivity distribution of the earth’s electric and magnetic fields, mainly due to the time-dependent variations and the high-frequency electromagnetic waves artificially transmitted by non-polarization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ERT can only assess the subsurface at shallow depths 32,62 . CSAMT, on the other hand, is becoming the most suitable and economical geophysical method to obtain detailed information of the subsurface at large depths 17,31,[63][64][65][66] . Resistivity is a function of rock porosity and, consequently, the degree of fracturing in the rock mass; it is also strongly controlled by other factors including rock type, mineral and water contents, joint fissures development, temperature, pressure and pore-water electrical conductivity (EC).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data processing was also similar to that in CSAMT [ 42 ]. The apparent resistivities were used to perform a laterally constrained inversion [ 43 , 44 ].…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two-and three-dimensional CSAMT inversions are presumed to reflect the real underground resistivity model, and the layer demarcation is still based on the speculation of the values of the model-calculated resistivity (CRM) (Xiong et al, 2019;Zonge & Hughes, 1991). Although the CSAMT interpretations are based on lateral and vertical resistivity distributions, the conceptual model still has difficulty accurately describing stratigraphic logs composed of underground layers (Esnault et al, 2014;McNeill, 1990McNeill, , 1991Ruo et al, 2015;Xepapadeas & Koundouri, 2004). Moreover, during the drilling operations, it is a challenging task to define layer contacts and thicknesses, especially in a complex geological area with numerous tectonic structures (faults, fractures, dikes etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, during the drilling operations, it is a challenging task to define layer contacts and thicknesses, especially in a complex geological area with numerous tectonic structures (faults, fractures, dikes etc.) (An & Di, 2010;He, 2018;Ruo et al, 2015). To solve this problem, most geophysicists have used additional methods to confirm the existence of an interesting underground structure, such as fracture zones and a water reservoir rock (WRR) (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%