The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2626(03)00075-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lateralized impairment of the emotional enhancement of verbal memory in patients with amygdala–hippocampus lesion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as a limitation we did not examine the arousal levels in the study. Furthermore, previous research highlighted amygdalar volume as the best predictor of EEM in AD [43] and impaired EEM for verbal material was related to left amygdalar dysfunction [50]. Therefore, asymmetrical involvement of the left amygdala may be responsible for isolated EEM deficiency for verbal stimuli in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, as a limitation we did not examine the arousal levels in the study. Furthermore, previous research highlighted amygdalar volume as the best predictor of EEM in AD [43] and impaired EEM for verbal material was related to left amygdalar dysfunction [50]. Therefore, asymmetrical involvement of the left amygdala may be responsible for isolated EEM deficiency for verbal stimuli in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Some functional imaging studies which directly compared positive and negative material found the predicted lateralized pattern of amygdala activation (Canli et al, 1998; Zalla et al, 2000), while others reported bilateral (Garavan et al, 2001; Yang et al, 2002) or left-lateralized amygdala activation for both valences (Schneider et al, 1997; Hamann and Mao, 2002). Consistent with this latter finding, the majority of studies examining emotional processing (Morris et al, 1998; Canli et al, 2000; Zalla et al, 2000) and long-term memory (LaBar and Phelps, 1998; Adolphs et al, 2000; Buchanan et al, 2001; Frank and Tomaz, 2003) for either negative or positive material found primarily left-sided amygdala involvement for both valences (for an overview see Wager et al, 2003; Zald, 2003; Beraha et al, 2012). Thus, these results suggest that the right amygdala may play a weaker role in emotional memory enhancement compared to the left amygdala (LaBar and Phelps, 1998; Adolphs et al, 2000; Buchanan et al, 2001; Meletti et al, 2003, 2009) and that the processing of negative stimuli may be subserved by the bilateral amygdalae (Liberzon et al, 2000; Hamann et al, 2002; Ritchey et al, 2008; Baeken et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This result corroborates previous findings suggesting that the left amygdala facilitates the on-line processing of especially verbal emotional stimuli (Anderson and Phelps, 2001; Hamann and Mao, 2002) and may help to explain why the left amygdala is more often associated with the processing of both valences compared to the right amygdala in the previous literature on emotional long-term memory processing (cf. Adolphs et al, 2000; Buchanan et al, 2001; Frank and Tomaz, 2003). That is, while the left amygdala may support the encoding of both positive and negative items as well as the consolidation of positive material, the right amygdala may primarily support the consolidation of negative material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This criticism is tempered by the fact that several previous studies have identified deficits in emotion related processing following unilateral amygdala lesions (Adolphs, Tranel, & Damasio, 2001; Akiyama et al, 2007; Anderson, Spencer, Fulbright, & Phelps, 2000; Bechara et al, 1995; Benuzzi et al, 2004; Coppens, van Paesschen, Vandenbulcke, & Vansteenwegen, 2010; Frank & Tomaz, 2003; LaBar, LeDoux, Spencer, & Phelps, 1995). Although deficits after unilateral lesions are not always as severe as those found after bilateral damage, these studies support the notion that unilateral damage can be sufficient to disrupt normal emotional processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%